Author's Keywords: procedural justice, satisfaction, conflict of interest, group decision making, relational judgments	Convention Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote! Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! Click here for more information.
Association: Name: International Communication Association URL: http://www.icahdq.org
Citation: URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p112960_index.html Direct Link: HTML Code:

McComas, Katherine., Waks, Leah., Simone, Leah. and Sherman, Linda. "Predicting Satisfaction and Outcome Acceptance with Decision-Making Processes: The Role of Procedural Justice" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, New Orleans Sheraton, New Orleans, LA, May 27, 2004 <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p112960_index.html>

McComas, K. A., Waks, L. , Simone, L. M. and Sherman, L. , 2004-05-27 "Predicting Satisfaction and Outcome Acceptance with Decision-Making Processes: The Role of Procedural Justice" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, New Orleans Sheraton, New Orleans, LA Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-26 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p112960_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: Maintaining the legitimacy of decision making processes in the eyes of participants is a key objective of creditable public involvement efforts; however, satisfying participants can be difficult, especially when competing interests are at stake. Research suggests that attention to procedural justice may offer one way to increase satisfaction and outcome acceptance. Procedural justice argues that people care about the fairness of the procedures, and research has shown that when procedures are viewed as fair, people are more satisfied with the process and accepting of the outcomes – at times, even when they do not get the outcomes they desire. Using survey data from attendees at 11 U.S. Food and Drug Administration advisory committee meetings, we tested whether procedural justice judgments predicted satisfaction with the FDA and its advisory committees and acceptance of advisory committee meeting outcomes. We also examined how contextual factors – namely, procedural knowledge, tolerance for potential conflicts of interest among advisory committee members, and participants’ stakes in the outcomes, influenced the results. The findings supported a strong role for procedural justice perceptions in predicting satisfaction and outcome acceptance among meeting attendees.

Framing Justice: Using the Concept of Procedural Justice to Advance Political Communication Research

Interest Group Coalitions and theSpatial Theory of Choice: A Spatial Model of Group Participation onAmicus Curiae Briefs.

Idiomatic Communication in Relational Stages: Relationships Between Idioms and Solidarity, Relational Satisfaction, and Affective Orientation

Revisiting Governance Models for Natural Resource Management in Kenya: A Qualitative Modeling of Procedural and Substantive Outcomes of Civil Society Participation.