All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

"Are you lying to me?"Suspicious Receivers' Interaction Goals and Strategic Behaviors within Dating Relationship
Unformatted Document Text:  Suspicious Receivers’ Goals and Behaviors 21 Suspicious receivers were also found to have relationship protection goals. Considering the partner’s feeling, avoiding negative evaluation, respecting the partner’s autonomy, and the willingness to continue the relationship were the interaction goals related to one’s desire to protect the current relationship with the partner. Given the insufficient legitimacy to directly display one’s suspicion, it seems that relationship protection goals with the functions of face protection and relational harmony maintenance become salient on a suspicious receiver’s mind. The finding of relationship protection goals in the context of suspicion is accordant with the findings in other research areas (i.e., taboo topics and social confrontation). When the confrontation has a potential to threaten the partner’s face needs, the topic is likely to be avoided (Baxter & Wilmot, 1985; Roloff & Johnson, 2001). Similarly, if the confrontation is risky due to its illegitimacy, individuals are known to weigh the negative consequences against the benefits of their action before initiating a confrontation with the partner (Stutman & Newell, 1990). The interaction goals of a suspicious receiver found in this study converge with the traditional interaction goal typology suggested by Clark and Delia (1979). It is reasoned that the most fundamental issues present in every interaction concern the issues of identity and relationship as well as the direct instrumental goal to influence others (Canary & Cody, 1994; Clark & Delia, 1979). The present study has found that suspicious receivers wanted to know the truth and alter the partner’s behaviors, and had a desire to present what they think and feel, but at the same time were concerned about potential relational damages that suspicion display might produce. In terms of a suspicious receiver’s strategic behaviors, seven behavioral strategies were identified in this study. Berger and Kellermann’s (1994) classification of passive, active, and interactive strategies were found to fit well in the discussion. According to the findings, individuals seem to handle their suspicion mostly in interactions with their partner. Directly

Authors: Kim, Induk.
first   previous   Page 21 of 30   next   last



background image
Suspicious Receivers’ Goals and Behaviors 21
Suspicious receivers were also found to have relationship protection goals. Considering
the partner’s feeling, avoiding negative evaluation, respecting the partner’s autonomy, and the
willingness to continue the relationship were the interaction goals related to one’s desire to
protect the current relationship with the partner. Given the insufficient legitimacy to directly
display one’s suspicion, it seems that relationship protection goals with the functions of face
protection and relational harmony maintenance become salient on a suspicious receiver’s mind.
The finding of relationship protection goals in the context of suspicion is accordant with the
findings in other research areas (i.e., taboo topics and social confrontation). When the
confrontation has a potential to threaten the partner’s face needs, the topic is likely to be avoided
(Baxter & Wilmot, 1985; Roloff & Johnson, 2001). Similarly, if the confrontation is risky due to
its illegitimacy, individuals are known to weigh the negative consequences against the benefits of
their action before initiating a confrontation with the partner (Stutman & Newell, 1990).
The interaction goals of a suspicious receiver found in this study converge with the
traditional interaction goal typology suggested by Clark and Delia (1979). It is reasoned that the
most fundamental issues present in every interaction concern the issues of identity and
relationship as well as the direct instrumental goal to influence others (Canary & Cody, 1994;
Clark & Delia, 1979). The present study has found that suspicious receivers wanted to know the
truth and alter the partner’s behaviors, and had a desire to present what they think and feel, but at
the same time were concerned about potential relational damages that suspicion display might
produce.
In terms of a suspicious receiver’s strategic behaviors, seven behavioral strategies were
identified in this study. Berger and Kellermann’s (1994) classification of passive, active, and
interactive strategies were found to fit well in the discussion. According to the findings,
individuals seem to handle their suspicion mostly in interactions with their partner. Directly


Convention
Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 21 of 30   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.