All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

"Are you lying to me?"Suspicious Receivers' Interaction Goals and Strategic Behaviors within Dating Relationship
Unformatted Document Text:  Suspicious Receivers’ Goals and Behaviors 8 behaviors (e.g., talking over the issue, arguing over the issue, talking around the issue, avoiding the issue, and avoiding the person) for the reduction of uncertainty (Planalp, Rutherford, & Honeycutt, 1988). Thus, following research question is presented: RQ1: To which level does a suspicious receiver experience message uncertainty, partner uncertainty, and relationship uncertainty? Suspicion and Relationship Protection How an individual strategically selects one’s response may rely on other interaction goals as well. It is this multiplicity of goals which shapes a person’s actual behavior (i.e., suspicion display in particular). Berger and Kellermann (1983) found that people often use self- disclosure or comforting behaviors, rather than direct questioning, to bring out information from their conversational partners. It is suggested that a trade-off between efficiency and social appropriateness occurs in an attempt to gather information, which leads people to employ less efficient but more socially appropriate strategies (Berger & Kellermann, 1983). Such compromising behaviors were found in suspicious receivers’ behaviors as well. Suspicious receivers encoded less suspicious probes (Buller et al., 1991), displayed more kinesic pleasantness and immediacy (Burgoon et al., 1995), and smiled longer while showing increased dominance and global involvement (Burgoon et al., 1996). It can be suggested that these behaviors, which are customarily associated with positive affect, allow the suspicious receiver to attain information from the sender, while displaying one’s suspicion less overtly. The trade-off has occurred here by not directly questioning the partner’s duplicity, which could be more efficient way to cope with one’s suspicion, but concealing one’s suspicion and further engaging in the interaction. That is, suspicious receivers behaved in a less obtrusive way of information gathering by compromising efficiency with social appropriateness. To shape one’s behavior in a socially appropriate manner is related with the person’s

Authors: Kim, Induk.
first   previous   Page 8 of 30   next   last



background image
Suspicious Receivers’ Goals and Behaviors 8
behaviors (e.g., talking over the issue, arguing over the issue, talking around the issue, avoiding
the issue, and avoiding the person) for the reduction of uncertainty (Planalp, Rutherford, &
Honeycutt, 1988). Thus, following research question is presented:
RQ1: To which level does a suspicious receiver experience message uncertainty, partner
uncertainty, and relationship uncertainty?
Suspicion and Relationship Protection
How an individual strategically selects one’s response may rely on other interaction
goals as well. It is this multiplicity of goals which shapes a person’s actual behavior (i.e.,
suspicion display in particular). Berger and Kellermann (1983) found that people often use self-
disclosure or comforting behaviors, rather than direct questioning, to bring out information from
their conversational partners. It is suggested that a trade-off between efficiency and social
appropriateness occurs in an attempt to gather information, which leads people to employ less
efficient but more socially appropriate strategies (Berger & Kellermann, 1983).
Such compromising behaviors were found in suspicious receivers’ behaviors as well.
Suspicious receivers encoded less suspicious probes (Buller et al., 1991), displayed more kinesic
pleasantness and immediacy (Burgoon et al., 1995), and smiled longer while showing increased
dominance and global involvement (Burgoon et al., 1996). It can be suggested that these
behaviors, which are customarily associated with positive affect, allow the suspicious receiver to
attain information from the sender, while displaying one’s suspicion less overtly. The trade-off
has occurred here by not directly questioning the partner’s duplicity, which could be more
efficient way to cope with one’s suspicion, but concealing one’s suspicion and further engaging
in the interaction. That is, suspicious receivers behaved in a less obtrusive way of information
gathering by compromising efficiency with social appropriateness.
To shape one’s behavior in a socially appropriate manner is related with the person’s


Convention
All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 8 of 30   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.