All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Faculty hiring and the accepability of online degrees
Unformatted Document Text:  12 After recommending one of the applicants, the administrators were asked to select one of three categories that best characterized their reason for their recommendation. They had the choice of indicating that they (a) have reservations about recommending an applicant whose doctoral degree was awarded by an online virtual university; that (b) an applicant’s doctoral degree was awarded by a traditional or an online virtual university would not be an issue that would be of concern; and (c) another consideration. Each of the categories was followed by space for written comments to allow further explanation for the selections. At the end of the questionnaire additional space was provided for comments regarding the choices and any additional information. In both scenarios the written comments and explanations were analyzed for patterns and thematic statements representing reasons for the choices. CATPAC, a qualitative research tool that is capable of creating displays of complex text associations (Woelfel & Stoyanoff, 1993) was used to initiate a qualitative analysis of the comments. The keyword frequencies created by the software were used draw out categories, evaluate patterns and reliably identify recurring themes (Glaser & Strauss, 1967; Gay, 1992). The forced-choice selections and the computer- assisted qualitative analysis provided an in-depth understanding of the choices the participants made, rather than to accept the questionnaire choices as simple categorical selections (Schumacher & McMillian, 1993). Results The responses came from departments that were evenly divided among the four different disciplines (humanities, social sciences, science / technology and professions) represented in the sample. Institutions from thirty-seven states participated with questionnaires being returned from fifty-nine state schools and forty-three private schools with student populations ranging from 5000 to 35,000. The number of applicants for each position ranged from five to three hundred with only twelve applicants out of 3,030 identified as holding a terminal degree from “virtual” university.

Authors: Adams, Jonathan.
first   previous   Page 12 of 26   next   last



background image
12
After recommending one of the applicants, the administrators were asked to select one of
three categories that best characterized their reason for their recommendation. They had the
choice of indicating that they (a) have reservations about recommending an applicant whose
doctoral degree was awarded by an online virtual university; that (b) an applicant’s doctoral
degree was awarded by a traditional or an online virtual university would not be an issue that
would be of concern; and (c) another consideration. Each of the categories was followed by
space for written comments to allow further explanation for the selections. At the end of the
questionnaire additional space was provided for comments regarding the choices and any
additional information.
In both scenarios the written comments and explanations were analyzed for patterns and
thematic statements representing reasons for the choices. CATPAC, a qualitative research tool
that is capable of creating displays of complex text associations (Woelfel & Stoyanoff, 1993)
was used to initiate a qualitative analysis of the comments. The keyword frequencies created by
the software were used draw out categories, evaluate patterns and reliably identify recurring
themes (Glaser & Strauss, 1967; Gay, 1992). The forced-choice selections and the computer-
assisted qualitative analysis provided an in-depth understanding of the choices the participants
made, rather than to accept the questionnaire choices as simple categorical selections
(Schumacher & McMillian, 1993).
Results
The responses came from departments that were evenly divided among the four different
disciplines (humanities, social sciences, science / technology and professions) represented in the
sample.
Institutions from thirty-seven states participated with questionnaires being returned from
fifty-nine state schools and forty-three private schools with student populations ranging from
5000 to 35,000. The number of applicants for each position ranged from five to three hundred
with only twelve applicants out of 3,030 identified as holding a terminal degree from “virtual”
university.


Convention
All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 12 of 26   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.