Citation

Factual Knowledge of Science among the American Public: Using Item Response Theory for Scale Reduction

Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles



Abstract:

Since 1979, the National Science Foundation has sponsored a biennial survey to assess public attitudes toward and understanding of science and technology. In an effort to reduce the length of the survey with hopes of improving response rates, this study developed a short form for the Factual Knowledge of Science (FKS) scale, one of the primary measures included in the survey. The FKS scale includes 18 questions designed to measure respondents’ knowledge of scientific concepts. Because the FKS scale is used for longitudinal comparisons, a primary concern was that the short form should perform in the same manner as the long form and retain as much information as possible. Data from the 1997, 1999, and 2001 surveys were used to develop and validate the short form. First, the knowledge questions were classified into eight content areas: life science, evolution, geology/geography, astronomy, radioactivity, physics, and chemistry. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses indicated that the items form a single factor. Item response theory analyses were conducted to evaluate the difficulty and discrimination of each item. Items for the short form were selected to represent all eight content areas and maintain the distribution of difficulty levels included on the long form. Discrimination parameters were also used in the selection of items. The resulting short form contained 11 items, had a correlation of .95 with the long form, and accounted for 90 percent of its variance. Cronbach’s alpha was nearly identical for the two forms. Group comparisons revealed that the short form detected the same patterns of differences between respondents based on gender, age, education level, and background in math and science as the long form. The results of this study support the reliability and validity of the short form, suggesting its suitability as an alternative to the current scale.

Author's Keywords:

Psychometrics
Convention
Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

Association:
Name: American Association for Public Opinion Research
URL:
http://www.aapor.org


Citation:
URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p115893_index.html
Direct Link:
HTML Code:

MLA Citation:

Bann, Carla., Schwerin, Michael. and Suerken, Cynthia. "Factual Knowledge of Science among the American Public: Using Item Response Theory for Scale Reduction" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Pointe Hilton Tapatio Cliffs, Phoenix, Arizona, May 11, 2004 <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p115893_index.html>

APA Citation:

Bann, C. M., Schwerin, M. and Suerken, C. , 2004-05-11 "Factual Knowledge of Science among the American Public: Using Item Response Theory for Scale Reduction" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Pointe Hilton Tapatio Cliffs, Phoenix, Arizona <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p115893_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Review Method: Peer Reviewed
Abstract: Since 1979, the National Science Foundation has sponsored a biennial survey to assess public attitudes toward and understanding of science and technology. In an effort to reduce the length of the survey with hopes of improving response rates, this study developed a short form for the Factual Knowledge of Science (FKS) scale, one of the primary measures included in the survey. The FKS scale includes 18 questions designed to measure respondents’ knowledge of scientific concepts. Because the FKS scale is used for longitudinal comparisons, a primary concern was that the short form should perform in the same manner as the long form and retain as much information as possible. Data from the 1997, 1999, and 2001 surveys were used to develop and validate the short form. First, the knowledge questions were classified into eight content areas: life science, evolution, geology/geography, astronomy, radioactivity, physics, and chemistry. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses indicated that the items form a single factor. Item response theory analyses were conducted to evaluate the difficulty and discrimination of each item. Items for the short form were selected to represent all eight content areas and maintain the distribution of difficulty levels included on the long form. Discrimination parameters were also used in the selection of items. The resulting short form contained 11 items, had a correlation of .95 with the long form, and accounted for 90 percent of its variance. Cronbach’s alpha was nearly identical for the two forms. Group comparisons revealed that the short form detected the same patterns of differences between respondents based on gender, age, education level, and background in math and science as the long form. The results of this study support the reliability and validity of the short form, suggesting its suitability as an alternative to the current scale.

Get this Document:

Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.

Associated Document Available Access Fee All Academic Inc.


Similar Titles:
Faculty-Student Service Learning, Research Teams and Political Science Concepts: The Case of a Historic Green-Building Project on a College Campus

Using the Web to Survey College Students: Institutional Characteristics That Influence Survey Quality

Developing Citizens: A Longitudinal Study of School, Family, and Community Influences on Students’ Commitments to Civic Participation


 
All Academic, Inc. is your premier source for research and conference management. Visit our website, www.allacademic.com, to see how we can help you today.