Citation

A Cross-National Framing Analysis of the September 11, 2001 Terrorist Attacks

Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles



Abstract:

Since the September 11 terrorist attacks on the United States, terrorism has become a predominant topic in the news. While there are some content analysis studies of US media coverage of the attacks, studies of how the terrorist attacks were covered by international media are very rare. This study fills this vacuum by looking at the framing of terrorism in the media of the Middle East, India, and the United States. From the perspective of comparative sociology of news-making, we examine how international news organizations framed this extraordinary event, in particular, various framing devices in the coverage such as metaphors, exemplars, catchphrases in addition to dominant frames. We argue that even in this era of globalization, international news-making remains inherently ethnocentric and nationalistic: the different framing and depictions of the same event are state- motivated/centered and stem from the lens of their dominant ideologies as defined by their political, economic and social systems. Therefore, we hypothesize that while there are different dominant frames of the Sept 11 attacks in the media of different countries, these dominant frames will similarly reinforce the structure of power in their respective countries.
Content analysis of the articles regarding the Sept 11 terrorist attacks will be conducted for Middle East newspapers through the website for Middle East Media Research Institute, Indian newspapers (The Hindustan Times, The Times of India and Tehelka), and US newspapers (New York Times, Washington Post, and USA Today) to locate the dominant frames and specific framing devices for the Sept 11 attacks coverage. The implications of this study for future framing research will be discussed.

Author's Keywords:

Sept 11 terrorist attacks, international coverage, framing, ideology, comparative content analysis
Convention
Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

Association:
Name: American Association for Public Opinion Research
URL:
http://www.aapor.org


Citation:
URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p116286_index.html
Direct Link:
HTML Code:

MLA Citation:

Dunn, Meredith. and Zhang, Weiwu. "A Cross-National Framing Analysis of the September 11, 2001 Terrorist Attacks" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Sheraton Music City, Nashville, TN, Aug 16, 2003 <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p116286_index.html>

APA Citation:

Dunn, M. and Zhang, W. , 2003-08-16 "A Cross-National Framing Analysis of the September 11, 2001 Terrorist Attacks" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Sheraton Music City, Nashville, TN <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p116286_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Review Method: Peer Reviewed
Abstract: Since the September 11 terrorist attacks on the United States, terrorism has become a predominant topic in the news. While there are some content analysis studies of US media coverage of the attacks, studies of how the terrorist attacks were covered by international media are very rare. This study fills this vacuum by looking at the framing of terrorism in the media of the Middle East, India, and the United States. From the perspective of comparative sociology of news-making, we examine how international news organizations framed this extraordinary event, in particular, various framing devices in the coverage such as metaphors, exemplars, catchphrases in addition to dominant frames. We argue that even in this era of globalization, international news-making remains inherently ethnocentric and nationalistic: the different framing and depictions of the same event are state- motivated/centered and stem from the lens of their dominant ideologies as defined by their political, economic and social systems. Therefore, we hypothesize that while there are different dominant frames of the Sept 11 attacks in the media of different countries, these dominant frames will similarly reinforce the structure of power in their respective countries.
Content analysis of the articles regarding the Sept 11 terrorist attacks will be conducted for Middle East newspapers through the website for Middle East Media Research Institute, Indian newspapers (The Hindustan Times, The Times of India and Tehelka), and US newspapers (New York Times, Washington Post, and USA Today) to locate the dominant frames and specific framing devices for the Sept 11 attacks coverage. The implications of this study for future framing research will be discussed.

Get this Document:

Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.

Associated Document Available Access Fee All Academic Inc.


Similar Titles:
Effects of the September 11th, 2001 Terrorist Attacks on Nonresponse in the National Survey on Drug Use and Health

A Cross-National Analysis of the Impact of Terrorist Attacks on Civil Liberties and Political Rights.

World Editorials on the September 11 Terrorist Attacks: Integrating News Flow Analysis in International Communication and Framing Analysis


 
All Academic, Inc. is your premier source for research and conference management. Visit our website, www.allacademic.com, to see how we can help you today.