Citation

Private Regulation of Food Safety by Retailers: Protection or Capture of Public Interests?

Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles



Abstract:

Shifts in governance from public towards private or mixed forms of regulation give rise to new interesting conceptual, theoretical and political problems of legitimacy, accountability and effectiveness. Are these new forms of regulation indeed more effective than traditional governmental regulation? How are public interests protected in private regulation? How are abuse and arbitrary application of power prevented? These new forms of regulation require new conceptualisations and a reconfiguration of relationships between the state and public and private actors.
Over the last decade, food safety has been high on political and business agendas. This resulted in new European and Dutch legislation emphasizing the primary responsibility of food producers for food safety. This paper focuses on the role of private actors in the regulation of food safety. Do private food safety regulators contribute to or interfere with public food safety regulation? What is the influence of state law (legislation, court decisions, legal actions) on private food safety regulation?
Review of existing literature on self-regulation shows seven important conditions for effectively protecting public interest by private regulation: 1) overlap between public and private interests, 2) small number of actors with shared fate, 3) highly organised sector, 4) effective monitoring compliance, 5) entrepreneurs acting as 'political citizen', 6) active involvement of line personnel in regulated businesses, and 7) potential for self-evaluation.
The paper concludes with an empirical case study of retailers as regulators of food safety. As dominant buyer, retailers may dictate the rules. A so-called market-driven standard is backed up by commercial power and does not depend exclusively on consensus and motivated cooperation by regulated firms. The British Retail Consortium standard, also adopted by the Dutch retailers association, is an example of direct private regulation by a powerful business partner. Retailers seek to harmonize food safety standards nationally and internationally.
Convention
All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

Association:
Name: The Law and Society Association
URL:
http://www.lawandsociety.org


Citation:
URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p116978_index.html
Direct Link:
HTML Code:

MLA Citation:

Havinga, Tetty. "Private Regulation of Food Safety by Retailers: Protection or Capture of Public Interests?" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the The Law and Society Association, Renaissance Hotel, Chicago, Illinois, May 27, 2004 <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p116978_index.html>

APA Citation:

Havinga, T. , 2004-05-27 "Private Regulation of Food Safety by Retailers: Protection or Capture of Public Interests?" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the The Law and Society Association, Renaissance Hotel, Chicago, Illinois <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p116978_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Review Method: Peer Reviewed
Abstract: Shifts in governance from public towards private or mixed forms of regulation give rise to new interesting conceptual, theoretical and political problems of legitimacy, accountability and effectiveness. Are these new forms of regulation indeed more effective than traditional governmental regulation? How are public interests protected in private regulation? How are abuse and arbitrary application of power prevented? These new forms of regulation require new conceptualisations and a reconfiguration of relationships between the state and public and private actors.
Over the last decade, food safety has been high on political and business agendas. This resulted in new European and Dutch legislation emphasizing the primary responsibility of food producers for food safety. This paper focuses on the role of private actors in the regulation of food safety. Do private food safety regulators contribute to or interfere with public food safety regulation? What is the influence of state law (legislation, court decisions, legal actions) on private food safety regulation?
Review of existing literature on self-regulation shows seven important conditions for effectively protecting public interest by private regulation: 1) overlap between public and private interests, 2) small number of actors with shared fate, 3) highly organised sector, 4) effective monitoring compliance, 5) entrepreneurs acting as 'political citizen', 6) active involvement of line personnel in regulated businesses, and 7) potential for self-evaluation.
The paper concludes with an empirical case study of retailers as regulators of food safety. As dominant buyer, retailers may dictate the rules. A so-called market-driven standard is backed up by commercial power and does not depend exclusively on consensus and motivated cooperation by regulated firms. The British Retail Consortium standard, also adopted by the Dutch retailers association, is an example of direct private regulation by a powerful business partner. Retailers seek to harmonize food safety standards nationally and internationally.

Get this Document:

Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.

Associated Document Available Access Fee All Academic Inc.


Similar Titles:
Product Liability, Insurance, and the Private Regulation of Food Safety

Global Private Regulation Amid Local Public Disarray: Private Environmental Regulation in Argentina and Brazil

American Interest Group Politics in the 21st Century: Public and Private Interests and the Deadlock of American Public Policy


 
All Academic, Inc. is your premier source for research and conference management. Visit our website, www.allacademic.com, to see how we can help you today.