Citation

The Impact of Social Institutions and Individual Life Domains on Criminal Behavior Over the Life Course

Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles



Abstract:

Traditionally, criminological theories have relied on either strictly macro- or micro-level variables in their explanations of criminal behavior. More recently, theorists have proposed the macro-micro integration of theoretical perspectives. For example, recent work by Agnew (2006, 2005), Akers (1998), and Sampson and Laub (1993; Laub and Sampson, 2003) have included propositions that implicate the need for cross-level theoretical models. In particular, Agnew (2005) points to the individual level life domains of self (i.e., personality traits and low self-control), family, school, peers, and work as explanatory factors in criminal behavior over the life course. Additionally, community level factors, including socioeconomic status and the function of social institutions, may influence criminal behavior through their impact on these life domains. For example, economic forces and the structure of social institutions may impact parenting factors (e.g., supervision and bonding), which then impact delinquency. The primary goal of the current study is to explore some of Agnew’s (2006, 2005) propositions with a longitudinal hierarchical dataset that contains three levels of data; time periods nested within individuals, nested within census tracts. Analyses will utilize Hierarchical Linear Modeling strategies to explore the impact of social institutions on individual-level social bonds and criminal behavior over the life course.
Convention
Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

Association:
Name: American Society of Criminology (ASC)
URL:
http://www.asc41.com


Citation:
URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p126926_index.html
Direct Link:
HTML Code:

MLA Citation:

Muftic, Lisa. and Bouffard, Leana. "The Impact of Social Institutions and Individual Life Domains on Criminal Behavior Over the Life Course" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology (ASC), <Not Available>. 2009-05-24 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p126926_index.html>

APA Citation:

Muftic, L. R. and Bouffard, L. A. "The Impact of Social Institutions and Individual Life Domains on Criminal Behavior Over the Life Course" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology (ASC) <Not Available>. 2009-05-24 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p126926_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Abstract: Traditionally, criminological theories have relied on either strictly macro- or micro-level variables in their explanations of criminal behavior. More recently, theorists have proposed the macro-micro integration of theoretical perspectives. For example, recent work by Agnew (2006, 2005), Akers (1998), and Sampson and Laub (1993; Laub and Sampson, 2003) have included propositions that implicate the need for cross-level theoretical models. In particular, Agnew (2005) points to the individual level life domains of self (i.e., personality traits and low self-control), family, school, peers, and work as explanatory factors in criminal behavior over the life course. Additionally, community level factors, including socioeconomic status and the function of social institutions, may influence criminal behavior through their impact on these life domains. For example, economic forces and the structure of social institutions may impact parenting factors (e.g., supervision and bonding), which then impact delinquency. The primary goal of the current study is to explore some of Agnew’s (2006, 2005) propositions with a longitudinal hierarchical dataset that contains three levels of data; time periods nested within individuals, nested within census tracts. Analyses will utilize Hierarchical Linear Modeling strategies to explore the impact of social institutions on individual-level social bonds and criminal behavior over the life course.

Get this Document:

Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.

Associated Document Available Access Fee All Academic Inc.


Similar Titles:
The Impact of Social Context on the Relationship between Individuals’ Criminal Propensity and Recidivism

The Impact of Neighbor Interaction: Examining the Role of Social Trust, Pro-Social Behavior and Networks on Perceived Disorder

Economic Life, Institutions, and Social Action: Reflections on Polanyi’s Approach to Studying Economic Life

Institutions and Corporate Strategies for Reorganzation: Revising theoretical models to probe the impact of specific institutions on corporate behavior in the era of globalization


 
All Academic, Inc. is your premier source for research and conference management. Visit our website, www.allacademic.com, to see how we can help you today.