Convention Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting. Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! Click here for more information.
Association: Name: American Society of Criminology (ASC) URL: http://www.asc41.com
Citation: URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p126996_index.html Direct Link: HTML Code:

Goodman, Philip. ""It's Just White, Black or Hispanic": An Ethnography of Racializing Moves in California's Segregated Prisons" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology (ASC), Los Angeles Convention Center, Los Angeles, CA, Nov 01, 2006 <Not Available>. 2009-05-24 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p126996_index.html>

Goodman, P. , 2006-11-01 ""It's Just White, Black or Hispanic": An Ethnography of Racializing Moves in California's Segregated Prisons" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology (ASC), Los Angeles Convention Center, Los Angeles, CA <Not Available>. 2009-05-24 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p126996_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Abstract: In February 2005 the United States Supreme Court ruled in Johnson v. California that the California Department of Corrections’ practice of racially segregating inmates in two-person cells in its reception centers is to be reviewed under the highest standard of constitutional review available, namely “strict scrutiny.” However, we know very little about how racial segregation is enacted in California’s reception centers. For example, what precisely is the role of California’s policies and practices using race-based classifications in creating both racialized inmates and racialized prisons? To understand this process—what I will call a “negotiated settlement”—I conducted an ethnography in several reception centers in California. As I argue in this paper, the U.S. Supreme Court’s understanding of racial segregation fixates on the perceived threat of the state treating citizens differently on the basis of skin color at the price of ignoring how corrections officials and inmates alike engage in a series of interactions within a highly institutionalized context to produce observable racial segregation. Prison officials embrace and enact a de facto policy of assigning incoming inmates to same-race living environments; at the same time, inmates play a key role in how this process unfolds and what consequences it has.

It’s Just Black, White, or Hispanic: An Ethnography of Racializing Moves in California’s Segregated Reception Centers

Black, White, Other? Why Racial Identifications within Hispanic Ethnicity Matter; A Look at Professional and Social Outcomes Among Research Doctorate Recipients

The Impact of Diverse Contexts on Racial Attitudes: Evaluating Threat and Contact among Whites, Blacks, and Hispanics