 |
A Day-Long Adjunct Training Institute
| |
| | Unformatted Document Text:
Proposal for a Roundtable Discussion of an Adjunct Training Institute
Section I: Content
A. Statement of the issue: Adjunct faculty recruitment and training. In this round table discussion, the presenter will chronicle the attempts of a Department of Curriculum and Instruction in a rural area of the mid-south to recruit and train a cadre of adjunct faculty for both initial licensure and advanced programs.
Background Inform ation: The department has lost 25% of its full-time faculty to retirement and to promotion/non-teaching assignments. There has been an increase in credit hour production at both the graduate and undergraduate levels within the past year, and cohorts are offered in venues up to 100 miles away, further stretching the full-time tenured/tenure track. Searches have been cancelled for financial reasons, leaving the department dependent upon hiring adjunct faculty to assist in program delivery. A request to the provost for more faculty was turned down, so the department will be forced to use adjuncts to teach about 20 of its courses each semester. This is a plight similar to that of other institutions.
Broader Context: The question which presents itself is: How does one “cover” classes and maintain the integrity of the existing program, assure high quality student learning, and continue to move forward improve existing programs? In the author’s first year as department chair, adjuncts were hired at the last minute, and fingers were kept crossed that there would be a faculty member for every class. Every class was covered, but this was not an experience the author wanted to repeat. It is vital to have a plan in place to best leverage available resources.
The author envisioned having a cadre of potential adjuncts from which to choose the most qualified for available courses. She also wanted to make sure that these adjuncts were well-versed in the standards, the curriculum, and the performance assessment measures being used to monitor candidate advancement. To that end, she contacted approximately 30 school districts within a 100-mile radius of the university, requesting letters of interest, resumes or vitae, and reference letters from teachers and administrators interested in adjunct teaching. Resumes and references were considered before approximately 50 respondents were invited to a one-day adjunct training session. The session was planned to introduce potential adjuncts to the unit standards, the goals and mission of the College of Education and the Department of Curriculum and Instruction, and the assessment points of the program. After a morning devoted to an overview of these items, as well as an introduction to the technology available, potential adjuncts heard about all of the programs within the department. They then had a chance to meet with program coordinators and full-time campus faculty to talk specifically about different courses and how they are taught. All of these steps, as well as the instruments used in the training, will be shared in the roundtable presentation.
|
| | Authors: Cummings, Rhona. |
|
| |
|
|
Proposal for a Roundtable Discussion of an Adjunct Training Institute
Section I: Content
A. Statement of the issue: Adjunct faculty recruitment and training. In this round table discussion, the presenter will chronicle the attempts of a Department of Curriculum and Instruction in a rural area of the mid-south to recruit and train a cadre of adjunct faculty for both initial licensure and advanced programs.
Background Inform ation: The department has lost 25% of its full-time faculty to retirement and to promotion/non-teaching assignments. There has been an increase in credit hour production at both the graduate and undergraduate levels within the past year, and cohorts are offered in venues up to 100 miles away, further stretching the full-time tenured/tenure track. Searches have been cancelled for financial reasons, leaving the department dependent upon hiring adjunct faculty to assist in program delivery. A request to the provost for more faculty was turned down, so the department will be forced to use adjuncts to teach about 20 of its courses each semester. This is a plight similar to that of other institutions.
Broader Context: The question which presents itself is: How does one “cover” classes and maintain the integrity of the existing program, assure high quality student learning, and continue to move forward improve existing programs? In the author’s first year as department chair, adjuncts were hired at the last minute, and fingers were kept crossed that there would be a faculty member for every class. Every class was covered, but this was not an experience the author wanted to repeat. It is vital to have a plan in place to best leverage available resources.
The author envisioned having a cadre of potential adjuncts from which to choose the most qualified for available courses. She also wanted to make sure that these adjuncts were well-versed in the standards, the curriculum, and the performance assessment measures being used to monitor candidate advancement. To that end, she contacted approximately 30 school districts within a 100-mile radius of the university, requesting letters of interest, resumes or vitae, and reference letters from teachers and administrators interested in adjunct teaching. Resumes and references were considered before approximately 50 respondents were invited to a one-day adjunct training session. The session was planned to introduce potential adjuncts to the unit standards, the goals and mission of the College of Education and the Department of Curriculum and Instruction, and the assessment points of the program. After a morning devoted to an overview of these items, as well as an introduction to the technology available, potential adjuncts heard about all of the programs within the department. They then had a chance to meet with program coordinators and full-time campus faculty to talk specifically about different courses and how they are taught. All of these steps, as well as the instruments used in the training, will be shared in the roundtable presentation.
|
|
Convention | | Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting. | | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. | | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! | | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! | | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. | | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! | | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|