|
|
|
|
News Grazers, New Media and Political Engagement: Who Are the Grazers? |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
The manner in which the American public watches television news has changed in the last few decades. Today, people watch TV news at more intermittent intervals, and often in a distracted or disinterested state. Also, electronic multitasking has become commonplace in mainstream America, especially among young adults. The television news consumer has more options and has become more skilled at navigating the media environment. This “news grazing” phenomenon is largely due to the diffusion of the remote control, the expanding number of viewing alternatives on the television, and the consequent market competition and audience segmentation among news media providers. News consumers have countless news opportunities that are constantly updated and easily accessible on cable television and the Internet. News grazers are individuals who take advantage of this new media environment to check in on the news from time to time with no set patterns and a passive eye toward information and events that may grab their fancy. Along the same lines, news grazers tend to follow the news on television, with their remote control in hand, “flipping” to other channels when they become disinterested (Pew Research Center 2004).
The emergence of the news grazing population in America prompts us to consider how consumption of news via this method influences public opinion and political engagement in America. This paper presents and theory of news grazing in America and profiles the political attitudes and behavior of the news grazer. News grazers seek different news in different ways than non-grazers, and the consequences are significant. News grazers gravitate toward those sources of news that best fit they newsgathering style—cable news. However, even with a significantly higher level of exposure to cable news than non-grazers, news grazers display some troubling characteristics with regard to quality democratic citizenship. When controlling for several demographic factors, news grazers are less knowledgeable about politics and less engaged in the political process than non-grazers. Overall, they also display higher levels of cynicism and an aversion to a policy-oriented political news. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
news (243), grazer (95), televis (83), polit (49), graze (46), control (39), 03 (37), 04 (36), 00 (35), remot (31), age (29), 02 (29), american (28), watch (27), vote (27), channel (26), non (26), 11 (25), 01 (25), 05 (24), media (24), |
|
 | Convention | | All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: Southern Political Science Association URL: http://www.spsa.net
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Forgette, Richard. and Morris, Jay. "News Grazers, New Media and Political Engagement: Who Are the Grazers?" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Hotel InterContinental, New Orleans, LA, Jan 03, 2007 <Not Available>. 2009-05-24 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p143372_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Forgette, R. and Morris, J. , 2007-01-03 "News Grazers, New Media and Political Engagement: Who Are the Grazers?" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Hotel InterContinental, New Orleans, LA Online <PDF>. 2009-05-24 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p143372_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Abstract: The manner in which the American public watches television news has changed in the last few decades. Today, people watch TV news at more intermittent intervals, and often in a distracted or disinterested state. Also, electronic multitasking has become commonplace in mainstream America, especially among young adults. The television news consumer has more options and has become more skilled at navigating the media environment. This “news grazing” phenomenon is largely due to the diffusion of the remote control, the expanding number of viewing alternatives on the television, and the consequent market competition and audience segmentation among news media providers. News consumers have countless news opportunities that are constantly updated and easily accessible on cable television and the Internet. News grazers are individuals who take advantage of this new media environment to check in on the news from time to time with no set patterns and a passive eye toward information and events that may grab their fancy. Along the same lines, news grazers tend to follow the news on television, with their remote control in hand, “flipping” to other channels when they become disinterested (Pew Research Center 2004).
The emergence of the news grazing population in America prompts us to consider how consumption of news via this method influences public opinion and political engagement in America. This paper presents and theory of news grazing in America and profiles the political attitudes and behavior of the news grazer. News grazers seek different news in different ways than non-grazers, and the consequences are significant. News grazers gravitate toward those sources of news that best fit they newsgathering style—cable news. However, even with a significantly higher level of exposure to cable news than non-grazers, news grazers display some troubling characteristics with regard to quality democratic citizenship. When controlling for several demographic factors, news grazers are less knowledgeable about politics and less engaged in the political process than non-grazers. Overall, they also display higher levels of cynicism and an aversion to a policy-oriented political news. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
PDF |
| Page count: |
24 |
| Word count: |
6208 |
| Text sample: |
| News Grazers Television News Political Knowledge and Engagement Jonathan S. Morris (contact author) Department of Political Science Brewster A-121 East Carolina University Greenville NC 27858 morrisj@mail.ecu.edu Richard Forgette Department of Political Science University of Mississippi 116 Deupree Hall P. O. Box 1848 University Mississippi 38677-1848 rforgett@olemiss.edu Presented at the 2007 Southern Political Science Association Meetings New Orleans January 4-7 2007. News Grazers Television News Political Knowledge and Engagement Abstract This study examines the modern-day television “news grazer” in American |
| 3.12 1.23 .75 2.68 3.07 Constant 4 1.82 4.41 2.61 2.33 3.81 4.47 LR x2 (6) 23.57** 40.64** 47.26** 48.99** 43.89** 48.27** N 244 382 523 482 350 419 Note: Cell entries are ordered logit coefficients with standard errors in parentheses. a The dependent variable is the degree to which the respondent votes (1=never votes; 2=seldom votes; 3=votes part of the time; 4=nearly always votes; 5=always votes). *p<.05 **p<.01 (two-tailed) |
Similar Titles:
What Do You Mean I Can Only Vote for One Party? Elite Views, Media Coverage, and Public Discourse Surrounding Washington State Primary Reform
Ideologically Extreme Political News and the News Grazer: Does Ideological News Reduce the Mediating Effects of Public Discourse?
Have the Media Talked Us Out of Voting? News Frames, Efficacy and Political Participation
|
|