|
|
|
|
Can a state’s demographics determine its punitive support of crime policies? A comparative state study of adoption of punitive drug legislation |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
t is often the case that Congress tends to support punitive drug legislation versus rehabilitative drug legislation. Why is there such an emphasis on punitive drug legislation? Why do Congressmen support such legislation? This paper will address these questions by answering a larger question, what role do internal determinants, particularly demographics, play in Congressional decision-making on punitive crime policies? This paper will focus upon the demographic similarities and differences between the congressmen?s respective states and their vote to uphold certain punitive crime policies. Further, this research aims to investigate a relationship between how certain Congressmen voted on the Anti-drug Abuse Acts passed during the 1980s and whether their respective states share similar characteristics. As such this paper will focus on punitive drug legislation (passed, rejected, and amended) during the war on drugs era of the late 1980s. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
vote (35), state (32), drug (28), punit (21), demograph (18), legisl (17), studi (14), polici (13), use (12), aspect (11), crime (10), amend (10), code (9), abus (9), anti (9), anti-drug (9), support (9), act (8), score (7), whether (7), 1988 (7), |
|
 | Convention | | All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: Southern Political Science Association URL: http://www.spsa.net
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Christie, Natasha. "Can a state’s demographics determine its punitive support of crime policies? A comparative state study of adoption of punitive drug legislation" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Hotel InterContinental, New Orleans, LA, Jan 03, 2007 <Not Available>. 2009-05-24 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p143814_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Christie, N. V. , 2007-01-03 "Can a state’s demographics determine its punitive support of crime policies? A comparative state study of adoption of punitive drug legislation" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Hotel InterContinental, New Orleans, LA Online <PDF>. 2009-05-24 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p143814_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Abstract: t is often the case that Congress tends to support punitive drug legislation versus rehabilitative drug legislation. Why is there such an emphasis on punitive drug legislation? Why do Congressmen support such legislation? This paper will address these questions by answering a larger question, what role do internal determinants, particularly demographics, play in Congressional decision-making on punitive crime policies? This paper will focus upon the demographic similarities and differences between the congressmen?s respective states and their vote to uphold certain punitive crime policies. Further, this research aims to investigate a relationship between how certain Congressmen voted on the Anti-drug Abuse Acts passed during the 1980s and whether their respective states share similar characteristics. As such this paper will focus on punitive drug legislation (passed, rejected, and amended) during the war on drugs era of the late 1980s. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
PDF |
| Page count: |
7 |
| Word count: |
1460 |
| Text sample: |
| Can a state’s demographics determine its punitive support of crime policies? A comparative state study of adoption of punitive drug legislation during the war on drugs era of the 1980s Natasha Christie University of Florida Abstract Drug legislation is much contested in the legislature as well as in the public because everyone has different opinions as to what should be done to cure our nation’s drug problem. However it seems to be overwhelmingly the case that since there is |
| drug policies can do more harm than good. As such it would be interesting to see if those Congressmen whose states contain similar demographics actually support punitive drug policies. i Marc Mauer Race to Incarcerate (New York: The New Press 1999) 142-161. ii Ibid. 156. iii There are eight amendments associated with this bill and there are as follows: vote no. 368- Death Penalty; vote no. 369-Racial Justice in Capital Sentencing; vote no. 370-death penalty for killers of innocent |
Similar Titles:
Determinants of Electoral Support for Anti-Gay Marriage Constitutional Amendments: An Examination of 2006 Votes on Ballot Measures in the States
The Distributive Patterns of Crime
Control Funding: A Comparison of Grant Distribution under the Anti-Drug
Abuse Act of 1988 and the Violent Crime Control Act of 1994
|
|