Author's Keywords: political campaign news; framing; press frames, accessibility effects; applicability effects	Convention Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events! Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! Click here for more information.
Association: Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
Citation: URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p152522_index.html Direct Link: HTML Code:

D'Angelo, Paul. "The Power of the Press: The Effects of Press Frames in Political Campaign News on Media Perceptions" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott, Loews Philadelphia, and the Pennsylvania Convention Center, Philadelphia, PA, Aug 31, 2006 <Not Available>. 2009-05-24 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p152522_index.html>

D'Angelo, P. A. , 2006-08-31 "The Power of the Press: The Effects of Press Frames in Political Campaign News on Media Perceptions" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott, Loews Philadelphia, and the Pennsylvania Convention Center, Philadelphia, PA Online <PDF>. 2009-05-24 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p152522_index.html

Publication Type: Proceeding Abstract: This paper discusses how the behaviors, roles, and standards of mainstream journalism are framed in political campaign news and empirically examines applicability and accessibility effects of press frames on individuals� media perceptions, specifically news information quality and negative aspects of content (cf. Kosicki & McLeod, 1990). Following previous work, we posited that journalists frame the press in three ways, called conduit, strategy, and accountability. Participants in a between-subjects experiment were exposed to a political campaign story about an exemplar �character issue� containing these frames. Regarding applicability effects, exposure to each press frame differentially prompted individuals to think frame-relevant subtopics were present in the story. Further, subjects exposed to the strategy press frame interpreted the press as being significantly more negative than individuals exposed to the conduit or accountability frame; subjects exposed to the accountability press frame interpreted the press as having higher news information quality than individuals exposed to the conduit or strategy frame. Regarding accessibility effects, only the accountability press frame prompted individuals to access prior beliefs about the news media in order to form opinions about negativity and quality. Implications for future study of press framing are discussed.

Mediated Politics: How Press Freedom, Media Ownership and News Exposure Influence Political Support

Political framing strategies and their impact on media framing in a Swiss direct-democratic campaign

The Power of the Press: The Effects of Press Frames in Political Campaign News On Media Perceptions