Citation

Bridging and Bonding in Cyberspace? The Impact of Online Communities on Social Capital and Political Participation

Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles




STOP!

You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below.

View Document as HTML:
Click here to view the document

Abstract:

Various opportunities exist on the internet for individuals to interact with others , building social capital in the process. However, questions exist as to the effects of this interaction on the political behavior. Putnam and others point out the difference between bridging social capital, where an individual’s network is made larger, and bonding social capital, where no new connections are made. If interaction on the internet leads merely to bonding social capital, then Putnam’s conclusions remain as valid as ever. But if the internet increases bridging social capital among the younger cohorts, then perhaps the outlook for future generations is not as bleak as predicted.

We utilize survey data from participants in one particular form of internet community to reach answers to these questions. MMORPGs (massively multiplayer online role-playing games) attract millions of individuals, who together create immersive online communities characterized by immense amounts of social interaction. Our survey utilizes multiple measures of social capital and political engagement, to determine what effect contact with a geographically dispersed population has on democratic participation.

Most Common Document Word Stems:

1 (98), 2 (88), activ (82), 3 (81), social (78), game (73), communiti (70), capit (59), particip (57), 4 (55), mmog (53), 5 (43), know (41), polit (40), putnam (39), indic (38), peopl (38), respond (34), time (32), group (32), import (27),

Author's Keywords:

social capital
Convention
Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

Association:
Name: American Political Science Association
URL:
http://www.apsanet.org


Citation:
URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p152576_index.html
Direct Link:
HTML Code:

MLA Citation:

Krueger, James., Cody, Scott. and Peckham, Matt. "Bridging and Bonding in Cyberspace? The Impact of Online Communities on Social Capital and Political Participation" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott, Loews Philadelphia, and the Pennsylvania Convention Center, Philadelphia, PA, Aug 31, 2006 <Not Available>. 2009-05-24 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p152576_index.html>

APA Citation:

Krueger, J. , Cody, S. and Peckham, M. , 2006-08-31 "Bridging and Bonding in Cyberspace? The Impact of Online Communities on Social Capital and Political Participation" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott, Loews Philadelphia, and the Pennsylvania Convention Center, Philadelphia, PA Online <PDF>. 2009-05-24 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p152576_index.html

Publication Type: Proceeding
Abstract: Various opportunities exist on the internet for individuals to interact with others , building social capital in the process. However, questions exist as to the effects of this interaction on the political behavior. Putnam and others point out the difference between bridging social capital, where an individual’s network is made larger, and bonding social capital, where no new connections are made. If interaction on the internet leads merely to bonding social capital, then Putnam’s conclusions remain as valid as ever. But if the internet increases bridging social capital among the younger cohorts, then perhaps the outlook for future generations is not as bleak as predicted.

We utilize survey data from participants in one particular form of internet community to reach answers to these questions. MMORPGs (massively multiplayer online role-playing games) attract millions of individuals, who together create immersive online communities characterized by immense amounts of social interaction. Our survey utilizes multiple measures of social capital and political engagement, to determine what effect contact with a geographically dispersed population has on democratic participation.

Get this Document:

Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.

Abstract Only All Academic Inc.
Associated Document Available Political Research Online
Associated Document Available American Political Science Association

Document Type: PDF
Page count: 33
Word count: 8600
Text sample:
1 Bridging and Bonding in Cyberspace? The Impact of Online Communities on Social Capital and Political Participation James Krueger Scott Cody and Matt Peckham Introduction Alexis de Tocqueville noted many years ago in Democracy in America that Americans tend to be joiners and that the groups we form and join constitute a crucial part of American politics. However the atmosphere that Tocqueville recorded in the 1800s may no longer exist. Since the publication of Robert Putnam’s Bowling Alone (2000)
sure; refused 62. Where would you place YOURSELF on this scale or haven't you thought much about this? 1. Extremely liberal 2. Liberal 3. Slightly liberal 4. Moderate; middle of the road 5. Slightly conservative 6. Conservative 7. Extremely conservative 8. Haven't thought much 9. Don't know 62a. If moderate haven’t thought much or don’t know: - If you had to choose would you consider yourself a liberal or a conservative? 1. Liberal 2. Conservative 3. Moderate 4. Don’t


Similar Titles:
Social Capital and Political Participation in America: An Individual or Group Level Relationship?

'Race' and 'Community' as Influences on Political Participation: Social Diversity and Social Capital Considered


 
All Academic, Inc. is your premier source for research and conference management. Visit our website, www.allacademic.com, to see how we can help you today.