Citation

Method and Agency Matter: Interactions between “experts” and “non-experts” in the production of “counter-hegemonic” knowledge

Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles




STOP!

You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below.

View Document as HTML:
Click here to view the document

Abstract:

This paper explores a question that has so far been under-explored in the study of civil society organizations: Which factors determine whether or not the interaction between “experts” working at NGOs and grassroots activists produces practices of knowledge construction that truly promote the moral, political and economic agency of popular groups with restricted access to “expert” knowledge? Such exploration is based on a literature review, complemented by an analysis of ethnographic data collected during the summer of 2006. The fieldwork data included in this paper is the result of a voluntary work experience at PACS – Instituto Politicas Alternativas para o Cone Sul, an NGO based in Rio de Janeiro. PACS is one of the most influential NGOs in the emergence and institutionalization of the Brazilian movement of Solidarity Socio-Economy. It had a fundamental role as the coordinator of the mobilization process that led to the creation, in 1996, of FCP-RJ - the Forum of Worker’s Cooperatives of Rio de Janeiro. This forum was the first organized structure created by the movement in Brazil to debate policy issues affecting cooperatives, networks of microenterprises, microcredit and the informal economy. For reasons of practicality and focus, this paper will only use field data on “Casa da Confiança” (“The House of Trust”), a microcredit and training project that PACS developed with members of neighborhood-based associations, in the framework of FCP-RJ. This project is a typical example of production of practices of knowledge construction that empower popular groups with restricted access to “expert” knowledge.

Most Common Document Word Stems:

knowledg (69), process (40), social (40), movement (39), expert (37), particip (26), member (22), translat (21), frame (19), univers (19), practic (19), make (18), meet (17), experi (17), da (16), power (16), confian (16), press (16), casa (16), relat (16), work (15),

Author's Keywords:

Sociology of knowledge, NGOs, Social Movements, Ethnography, Brazil
Convention
All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

Association:
Name: American Sociological Association
URL:
http://www.asanet.org


Citation:
URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p175346_index.html
Direct Link:
HTML Code:

MLA Citation:

Esteves, Ana Margarida. "Method and Agency Matter: Interactions between “experts” and “non-experts” in the production of “counter-hegemonic” knowledge" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, TBA, New York, New York City, Aug 11, 2007 <Not Available>. 2009-05-24 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p175346_index.html>

APA Citation:

Esteves, A. F. , 2007-08-11 "Method and Agency Matter: Interactions between “experts” and “non-experts” in the production of “counter-hegemonic” knowledge" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, TBA, New York, New York City Online <PDF>. 2009-05-24 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p175346_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Abstract: This paper explores a question that has so far been under-explored in the study of civil society organizations: Which factors determine whether or not the interaction between “experts” working at NGOs and grassroots activists produces practices of knowledge construction that truly promote the moral, political and economic agency of popular groups with restricted access to “expert” knowledge? Such exploration is based on a literature review, complemented by an analysis of ethnographic data collected during the summer of 2006. The fieldwork data included in this paper is the result of a voluntary work experience at PACS – Instituto Politicas Alternativas para o Cone Sul, an NGO based in Rio de Janeiro. PACS is one of the most influential NGOs in the emergence and institutionalization of the Brazilian movement of Solidarity Socio-Economy. It had a fundamental role as the coordinator of the mobilization process that led to the creation, in 1996, of FCP-RJ - the Forum of Worker’s Cooperatives of Rio de Janeiro. This forum was the first organized structure created by the movement in Brazil to debate policy issues affecting cooperatives, networks of microenterprises, microcredit and the informal economy. For reasons of practicality and focus, this paper will only use field data on “Casa da Confiança” (“The House of Trust”), a microcredit and training project that PACS developed with members of neighborhood-based associations, in the framework of FCP-RJ. This project is a typical example of production of practices of knowledge construction that empower popular groups with restricted access to “expert” knowledge.

Get this Document:

Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.

Associated Document Available Access Fee All Academic Inc.
Associated Document Available Access Fee American Sociological Association

Document Type: PDF
Page count: 20
Word count: 5526
Text sample:
Method and Agency Matter: Interactions between “experts” and “non-experts” in the production of “counter- hegemonic” knowledge Author: Ana Margarida Fernandes Esteves Brown University This paper is part of a larger project studying Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) as “social movement brokers”1 meaning intermediaries connecting social movements to broader networks. It explores a question that has so far been under- explored in the study of such organizations: Which factors determine whether or not the interaction between “experts” working at NGOs and grassroots
Santos Boaventura de. 2005. “The Future of the World Social Forum: The Work of Translation”. Development 48 (2): 15-22 Spivak Gayatri C. 1999.”Translation as Culture.” Pp. 17-30 in Translating Cultures edited by I.C. Suárez. Oviedo: KRK Ediciones Tsing Anna. 2005. Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press 19 Wainwright 1993. “A New Kind of Knowledge for a New Kind of State.” Pp. 112-121 in A Different Kind of State? Popular Power and Democratic Administration edited


Similar Titles:
The Power of Feelings & Social Movement Theorizing: Psychoanalytic Theory Meets the “Political Process Model”

How the Soft Pressure from Above transforms the Bottom: Member States’ social policy, national policy-making processes, and Europeanization.

Framing Parolees: Discretionary Decision Making Processes Within the Relational Contexts of Social Control


 
All Academic, Inc. is your premier source for research and conference management. Visit our website, www.allacademic.com, to see how we can help you today.