|
|
|
|
A Non-Territorial Ethnic Network and the Making of Human Rights Regime: The Case of the Alliance Israélite Universelle |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
|
Abstract:
|
This paper analyzes the development of human rights law through the case study of the Alliance Israélite Universelle - a non-territorial Jewish network that flourished between 1860 and 1920, producing and sustaining a form of Jewish group identity with transnational public-political capabilities. I advance two propositions. First, that the efforts of the Alliance had a substantial impact upon the shaping of modern human rights law. Second, that, although the Alliance played an active role in institutionalizing the modern state system, its vision of human rights was very different from that embodied in our modern legal systems. These differences are revealed in an analysis of the role played by the Alliance during the negotiations over the Minorities Treaties at the Paris Peace Conference in 1918. The Alliance had historically supported individual rights for members of ethnic minorities, promoting the assimilation of minority peoples and civil and political equality in the public realm of the state. At the same time, the Alliance believed that the non-territorial ethnic community was different, with its particularity to be formally recognized and affirmed by the international legal system. However, the Alliance was ultimately forced to compromise this vision, arguing instead that minority ethnic communities receive cultural autonomy as groups within the state framework. These minority group-rights were confined to the private realm and fell short of political self-rule or the ability to act independently in international fora. This enduring configuration has left our modern legal discourse without the option of muscular non-territorial ethnic group identities, driving contemporary ethnic communities to seek territorial self-determination as a means toward international visibility. |
|
 | Convention | | All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: The Law and Society Association URL: http://www.lawandsociety.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Paz, Moria. "A Non-Territorial Ethnic Network and the Making of Human Rights Regime: The Case of the Alliance Israélite Universelle" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the The Law and Society Association, TBA, Berlin, Germany, Jul 24, 2007 <Not Available>. 2010-01-24 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p177830_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Paz, M. , 2007-07-24 "A Non-Territorial Ethnic Network and the Making of Human Rights Regime: The Case of the Alliance Israélite Universelle" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the The Law and Society Association, TBA, Berlin, Germany <Not Available>. 2010-01-24 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p177830_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Abstract: This paper analyzes the development of human rights law through the case study of the Alliance Israélite Universelle - a non-territorial Jewish network that flourished between 1860 and 1920, producing and sustaining a form of Jewish group identity with transnational public-political capabilities. I advance two propositions. First, that the efforts of the Alliance had a substantial impact upon the shaping of modern human rights law. Second, that, although the Alliance played an active role in institutionalizing the modern state system, its vision of human rights was very different from that embodied in our modern legal systems. These differences are revealed in an analysis of the role played by the Alliance during the negotiations over the Minorities Treaties at the Paris Peace Conference in 1918. The Alliance had historically supported individual rights for members of ethnic minorities, promoting the assimilation of minority peoples and civil and political equality in the public realm of the state. At the same time, the Alliance believed that the non-territorial ethnic community was different, with its particularity to be formally recognized and affirmed by the international legal system. However, the Alliance was ultimately forced to compromise this vision, arguing instead that minority ethnic communities receive cultural autonomy as groups within the state framework. These minority group-rights were confined to the private realm and fell short of political self-rule or the ability to act independently in international fora. This enduring configuration has left our modern legal discourse without the option of muscular non-territorial ethnic group identities, driving contemporary ethnic communities to seek territorial self-determination as a means toward international visibility. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
Similar Titles:
CITIZENSHIP AND HUMANITY IN THE MAKING: HUMAN RIGHTS, NON-CITIZENS, AND THE RECONSTITUTION OF POLITICS
Burden-sharing and Threat Perception: Advantages and Limitations of the Use of the Alliance Security Dilemma Model for Decision-making in Alliance Politics: The Case of Spain as a Non Nuclear Weapons
International Law, Non-Territorial Ethnic Political Identity and The Politics of Education: The Case of the Alliance Israélite Universelle
|
|