|
|
|
|
Provincial Reconstruction Teams (PRTs) in Afghanistan: A New Model for Civil-Military Coordination in Peace Operations |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
The Provincial Reconstruction Teams (PRTs) are ?non-kinetic? operations carried out jointly by small number of lightly armed military personnel and civilian staff from the diplomatic community and development agencies to promote governance, security and reconstruction throughout the post-9.11 Afghanistan and Iraq. PRTs can be characterized in two ways: one as a miniature of multidimensional peacekeeping operations or ?peacekeeping-lite,? and the other as an extended civil-military operation center (CMOC) or ?super-CMOC.? This study sheds light on the latter perspective of PRTs and defines PRTs as small, inter-agency organizations that were invented as a new form of civil-military coordination to maximize synergic effects among various agencies working towards peace and reconstruction in Afghanistan and Iraq.This study seeks to provide an objective review of the concept and the performance of PRTs in order to illustrate the possibilities and limits of PRTs in peacebuilding in Afghanistan and Iraq, and to contribute to current debate on whether the PRT model is applicable to other peace and stability operations as a new form for civil-military coordination.The existing studies on PRTs are based on anecdotal evidences and put forward in the absence of a shared understanding of the activities of PRTs and their effect upon the peacebuilding process in Afghanistan and Iraq, much less, agreed standards and measures of effectiveness which are necessary to commence a fruitful dialogue between divergent perspectives. In short, the PRTs need a systematic approach to measuring their success as a super-CMOC. Furthermore, current debates on PRTs failed to be built upon the existing discourse on civil-military coordination and cooperation in peace and stability operations despite the fact that PRTs are a form of civil-military operation tailored to suit the situation in Afghanistan or Iraq. Hence, this study purports to present a base-line analysis for developing a set of criteria for evaluating the performance of PRTs as a mode of inter-agency civil-military coordinating mechanism by referring to a discussion on civil-military coordination and cooperation in peace operations. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
militari (159), prts (141), humanitarian (113), civil (104), secur (96), afghanistan (79), civil-militari (79), oper (76), develop (71), civilian (59), gap (53), agenc (53), govern (48), prt (48), effect (44), local (35), forc (33), peacebuild (31), coordin (31), fill (30), principl (30), |
|
 | Convention | | All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: International Studies Association 48th Annual Convention URL: http://www.isanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Uesugi, Yuji. "Provincial Reconstruction Teams (PRTs) in Afghanistan: A New Model for Civil-Military Coordination in Peace Operations" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association 48th Annual Convention, Hilton Chicago, CHICAGO, IL, USA, Feb 28, 2007 <Not Available>. 2009-05-24 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p178892_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Uesugi, Y. , 2007-02-28 "Provincial Reconstruction Teams (PRTs) in Afghanistan: A New Model for Civil-Military Coordination in Peace Operations" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association 48th Annual Convention, Hilton Chicago, CHICAGO, IL, USA Online <APPLICATION/PDF>. 2009-05-24 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p178892_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Abstract: The Provincial Reconstruction Teams (PRTs) are ?non-kinetic? operations carried out jointly by small number of lightly armed military personnel and civilian staff from the diplomatic community and development agencies to promote governance, security and reconstruction throughout the post-9.11 Afghanistan and Iraq. PRTs can be characterized in two ways: one as a miniature of multidimensional peacekeeping operations or ?peacekeeping-lite,? and the other as an extended civil-military operation center (CMOC) or ?super-CMOC.? This study sheds light on the latter perspective of PRTs and defines PRTs as small, inter-agency organizations that were invented as a new form of civil-military coordination to maximize synergic effects among various agencies working towards peace and reconstruction in Afghanistan and Iraq.This study seeks to provide an objective review of the concept and the performance of PRTs in order to illustrate the possibilities and limits of PRTs in peacebuilding in Afghanistan and Iraq, and to contribute to current debate on whether the PRT model is applicable to other peace and stability operations as a new form for civil-military coordination.The existing studies on PRTs are based on anecdotal evidences and put forward in the absence of a shared understanding of the activities of PRTs and their effect upon the peacebuilding process in Afghanistan and Iraq, much less, agreed standards and measures of effectiveness which are necessary to commence a fruitful dialogue between divergent perspectives. In short, the PRTs need a systematic approach to measuring their success as a super-CMOC. Furthermore, current debates on PRTs failed to be built upon the existing discourse on civil-military coordination and cooperation in peace and stability operations despite the fact that PRTs are a form of civil-military operation tailored to suit the situation in Afghanistan or Iraq. Hence, this study purports to present a base-line analysis for developing a set of criteria for evaluating the performance of PRTs as a mode of inter-agency civil-military coordinating mechanism by referring to a discussion on civil-military coordination and cooperation in peace operations. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
application/pdf |
| Page count: |
18 |
| Word count: |
9333 |
| Text sample: |
| Please do not quote without the author’s permission. Provincial Reconstruction Teams (PRTs) in Afghanistan: Filling the Gaps in Peacebuilding By Yuji Uesugi (Associate Professor at the Hiroshima University) uesugi@hiroshima-u.ac.jp I. Introduction 1. The Scope of the Research The Provincial Reconstruction Teams (PRTs) are ‘non-kinetic’ operations carried out jointly by small number of lightly armed military personnel and civilian staff from the diplomatic community and development agencies to promote governance security and development throughout the post-9.11 Afghanistan.1 This paper sheds |
| process must be regarded as trustworthy and the current government as legitimate by the Afghan people. Indeed development without governance is meaningless and governance without development is unachievable. But governance without security is unachievable and security without governance is meaningless. So far the international community created PRTs to fill in the civil-military gap and the security-development gap but it has not been able to address this security-governance gap or the local capacity gap. In fact local capacity development is |
Similar Titles:
Civil-Military Practices in Post-Conflict Reconstruction:The Interaction Between External Military Forces and Local Social Systems in Kosovo, Afghanistan and Iraq
Military Duel, Police Operation or Struggle over Legitimacy? Symbolical Mediation in Security and Stabilisation Operations in Kosovo, Afghanistan and Iraq
|
|