Convention All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting. Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! Click here for more information.
Association: Name: International Studies Association 48th Annual Convention URL: http://www.isanet.org
Citation: URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p179795_index.html Direct Link: HTML Code:

Latini, Diletta. "The Transatlantic Rift over the Use of Force in Iraq: Insights from a Comparative Analysis of the Media Debates and Public Opinion in the United States, France and Italy" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association 48th Annual Convention, Hilton Chicago, CHICAGO, IL, USA, Feb 28, 2007 <Not Available>. 2009-05-24 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p179795_index.html>

Latini, D. , 2007-02-28 "The Transatlantic Rift over the Use of Force in Iraq: Insights from a Comparative Analysis of the Media Debates and Public Opinion in the United States, France and Italy" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association 48th Annual Convention, Hilton Chicago, CHICAGO, IL, USA <Not Available>. 2009-05-24 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p179795_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Abstract: This paper is part of an ongoing research project aimed at providing more insights into the transatlantic rift over the use of force in the Iraq crisis, namely a better understanding of the reasons why the issue of the resort to military force against the Iraqi threat led progressively to strong disagreements among the American and European political leaders and the American and European publics about the efficacy and legitimacy of the use of force, particularly to strong anti-American and anti-European feelings. The project aims also at providing more insights into the role that media may play in the public perception and support of the United States and European Union as security actors. In order to attain such aims, the project investigates the interplay of the elite discourse with media and public opinion in the United States and in two European countries (France and Italy) that are still neglected in the literature on the media coverage of the Iraq crisis. The main argument is that, while there might be a synchronization in the focus of the external strategic events covered by the news media across the United States and Europe, there might be also important differences in the amount of media coverage of the crisis and in the news media debates, rooted in specific political-institutional as strategic-cultural contexts. Furthermore, while it is clear that public opinion and media may influence the decision-making process in foreign policy, their role is not systematic, but dynamic.

Japanese and US Media Coverage of the Iraq War: A Comparative Analysis of the Media's Impact on Public Opinion

Japanese and U.S. Media Coverage of the Iraq War: A Comparative Analysis of Media's Impact on Public Opinion

Japanese and U.S. Media Coverage of the Iraq War: A Comparative Analysis of Media’s Impact on Public Opinion