|
|
|
|
Norm Diffusion: Top-Down or Bottom-Up? Small Arms Norms in South Africa, El Salvador, and on the International Level |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
This paper provides a critique of and an amendment to Risse and Sikkink?s ?spiral model? of international norm diffusion (Risse, Ropp, and Sikkink, The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change, 1999) for the case of small arms norms. A comparison of norm development processes in the area of small arms control in South Africa and El Salvador shows that the model's basic assumption?international norms lead to domestic change?is not necessarily applicable to the area of small arms norms. The paper contends that small arms norm diffusion is an example of an earlier stage in the norm development process, at which national-level norms feed into international norm development. By contrast, human rights norms?the basis for Risse and Sikkink's model?had reached a much more mature stage in the 1990s, at which diffusion happens "top-down", i.e. from the international to the national level. In the case of South Africa, a relatively strong national norm (the Firearms Control Act of 2000) preceded, and arguably fed into, a weak norm on the international level (the UN Programme of Action of 2001). In El Salvador, small arms norm development was more complex: National legislation on firearms control was significantly revised in 1999, but was amended in 2002, possibly in response to international developments and thus marking a transition to a more mature stage of norm diffusion.The analysis focuses on a set of international small arms norms, including the UN Programme of Action, and national-level norms in South Africa and El Salvador. Processes of norm development on both the national and the international levels are traced on the basis of interviews with individuals from all stakeholder groups: civil society organizations, research bodies, pro-gun lobby groups, and governmental agencies, as well as printed material. A network-analytic perspective is applied to explain norm development. Whether a norm is developed and how strong it is then depends on which focal point in the network has the greatest density: the one around which those individuals working towards greater normative control are centered, or the one among those opposed to it. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
arm (137), small (113), norm (94), intern (91), nation (71), govern (70), actor (65), global (60), ngos (58), level (55), network (53), process (52), civil (50), societi (50), develop (49), south (47), polici (44), rearm (40), africa (40), 2001 (38), ed (35), |
|
 | Convention | | Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events! |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: International Studies Association 48th Annual Convention URL: http://www.isanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Glatz, Anne-Kathrin. "Norm Diffusion: Top-Down or Bottom-Up? Small Arms Norms in South Africa, El Salvador, and on the International Level" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association 48th Annual Convention, Hilton Chicago, CHICAGO, IL, USA, Feb 28, 2007 <Not Available>. 2009-05-24 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p180230_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Glatz, A. , 2007-02-28 "Norm Diffusion: Top-Down or Bottom-Up? Small Arms Norms in South Africa, El Salvador, and on the International Level" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association 48th Annual Convention, Hilton Chicago, CHICAGO, IL, USA Online <APPLICATION/FORCE-DOWNLOAD>. 2009-05-24 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p180230_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Abstract: This paper provides a critique of and an amendment to Risse and Sikkink?s ?spiral model? of international norm diffusion (Risse, Ropp, and Sikkink, The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change, 1999) for the case of small arms norms. A comparison of norm development processes in the area of small arms control in South Africa and El Salvador shows that the model's basic assumption?international norms lead to domestic change?is not necessarily applicable to the area of small arms norms. The paper contends that small arms norm diffusion is an example of an earlier stage in the norm development process, at which national-level norms feed into international norm development. By contrast, human rights norms?the basis for Risse and Sikkink's model?had reached a much more mature stage in the 1990s, at which diffusion happens "top-down", i.e. from the international to the national level. In the case of South Africa, a relatively strong national norm (the Firearms Control Act of 2000) preceded, and arguably fed into, a weak norm on the international level (the UN Programme of Action of 2001). In El Salvador, small arms norm development was more complex: National legislation on firearms control was significantly revised in 1999, but was amended in 2002, possibly in response to international developments and thus marking a transition to a more mature stage of norm diffusion.The analysis focuses on a set of international small arms norms, including the UN Programme of Action, and national-level norms in South Africa and El Salvador. Processes of norm development on both the national and the international levels are traced on the basis of interviews with individuals from all stakeholder groups: civil society organizations, research bodies, pro-gun lobby groups, and governmental agencies, as well as printed material. A network-analytic perspective is applied to explain norm development. Whether a norm is developed and how strong it is then depends on which focal point in the network has the greatest density: the one around which those individuals working towards greater normative control are centered, or the one among those opposed to it. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
application/force-download |
| Page count: |
39 |
| Word count: |
11570 |
| Text sample: |
| Norm Diffusion: Top-Down or Bottom-Up? Small Arms Norms in El Salvador South Africa and on the International Level1 Paper prepared for the 48th Annual ISA Convention Chicago 28 February–3 March 2007 work in progress—not for citation—comments welcome! Anne-Kathrin Glatz Graduate Institute of International Studies Geneva Switzerland glatz3@hei.unige.ch 26th February 2007 1 This paper draws on my paper “Cross-Actor Networks in Norm Development: The Case of Small Arms in South Africa” presented at the 47th Annual ISA Convention San Diego |
| 36 Warkentin Craig and Karen Mingst. “International Institutions the State and Global Civil Society in the Age of the World Wide Web.” Global Gov- ernance 6 (April-June 2000): 237–256. Wejnert Barbara. “Integrating Models of Diffusion of Innovations: A Con- ceptual Framework.” Annual Review of Sociology 28 (August 2002): 297– 326. Willetts Peter. “From ‘Consultative Arrangements’ to ‘Partnership’: The Changing Status of NGOs in Diplomacy at the UN.” Global Governance 6 (April-June 2000): 191–213. Willetts Peter (ed.). “The Conscience of |
Similar Titles:
Multi-Level Governance and Civil Society: Comparing Non-State Actors in International Organizations Theoretical Aspects on NGO- Participation in the United Nations and the European Union
Cross-Actor Networks in Norm Development: The Case of Small Arms in South Africa
|
|