|
|
|
|
Regimenting the Global Environment: Regimes, Non-regimes and the Invisibility of Sustainable Mountain Development |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
For more than two decades global environmental politics scholars have worked to refine a theoretical lens through which pressing ecological problems are recognized, defined, explored, and analyzed. Although the regime concept has proven fruitful in shedding light on international attempts to address ozone depletion, climate change, or whaling, the homogenizing effect of scholarly theorizing has narrowed the range of acknowledged issues and ? insofar as they have had an impact on negotiations- mitigative approaches, rendering many environmental problems invisible and/or intractable. Critics of the regime lens have recently made inroads in revealing the shortcomings of the concept, including its excess emphasis on nation states as near-exclusive actors, international legal instruments as preferred tools, and rational scientific knowledge as chief adjudicator of argumentation. They have coined the term ?non-regime? to address forestry and coral reefs, but the neologism merely reinforces the received wisdom, communicating to practitioners that what regimes have is what non-regimes lack. Using mountain regions as a case study of a globally significant but increasingly vulnerable biome type, this paper argues that an altogether different view of global environmental politics may be useful, both for scholars and practitioners. Such a view, elements of which are gradually coming to the fore, refuses to privilege the nation state, global treaties, scientific knowledge, or even the simplistic but widespread notion of a linear policy cycle. Instead, a more sociologically informed lens allows for governance mechanisms at multiple scales and scopes, diverse organizational landscapes, and context-specific knowledge grounded in the cultural landscapes of mountain regions. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
intern (180), mountain (169), regim (118), global (116), govern (85), develop (83), environment (81), public (52), region (50), sustain (44), polit (44), concept (44), state (44), actor (43), institut (40), sphere (37), issu (35), chang (34), world (34), knowledg (32), view (31), |
|
 | Convention | | All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: International Studies Association 48th Annual Convention URL: http://www.isanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Balsiger, Joerg. "Regimenting the Global Environment: Regimes, Non-regimes and the Invisibility of Sustainable Mountain Development" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association 48th Annual Convention, Hilton Chicago, CHICAGO, IL, USA, Feb 28, 2007 <Not Available>. 2009-05-24 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p180685_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Balsiger, J. , 2007-02-28 "Regimenting the Global Environment: Regimes, Non-regimes and the Invisibility of Sustainable Mountain Development" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association 48th Annual Convention, Hilton Chicago, CHICAGO, IL, USA Online <APPLICATION/PDF>. 2009-05-24 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p180685_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Abstract: For more than two decades global environmental politics scholars have worked to refine a theoretical lens through which pressing ecological problems are recognized, defined, explored, and analyzed. Although the regime concept has proven fruitful in shedding light on international attempts to address ozone depletion, climate change, or whaling, the homogenizing effect of scholarly theorizing has narrowed the range of acknowledged issues and ? insofar as they have had an impact on negotiations- mitigative approaches, rendering many environmental problems invisible and/or intractable. Critics of the regime lens have recently made inroads in revealing the shortcomings of the concept, including its excess emphasis on nation states as near-exclusive actors, international legal instruments as preferred tools, and rational scientific knowledge as chief adjudicator of argumentation. They have coined the term ?non-regime? to address forestry and coral reefs, but the neologism merely reinforces the received wisdom, communicating to practitioners that what regimes have is what non-regimes lack. Using mountain regions as a case study of a globally significant but increasingly vulnerable biome type, this paper argues that an altogether different view of global environmental politics may be useful, both for scholars and practitioners. Such a view, elements of which are gradually coming to the fore, refuses to privilege the nation state, global treaties, scientific knowledge, or even the simplistic but widespread notion of a linear policy cycle. Instead, a more sociologically informed lens allows for governance mechanisms at multiple scales and scopes, diverse organizational landscapes, and context-specific knowledge grounded in the cultural landscapes of mountain regions. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
application/pdf |
| Page count: |
34 |
| Word count: |
12290 |
| Text sample: |
| Regimenting the Global Environment: Regimes Nonregimes and the Invisibility of Sustainable Mountain Development Jörg Balsiger Department of Environmental Science Policy & Management University of California Berkeley Paper prepared for the 2007 International Studies Association Annual Conference February 28 – March 3 2007 Chicago DRAFT – DO NOT CITE WITHOUT AUTHOR’S PERMISSION In his address to the Internatio Studies Association Annual Conference in 2003 President-elect nal Steve Smith made a powerful argument about the intrinsic link between ethics and the |
| Routledge. Wettestad Jørgen. 2006. The Effectiveness of Environmental Policies. In Palgrave Advances in International Environmental Politics edited by Michele M. Betsill Kathryn Hochstetler and Dimitris Stevis 299-328. Basingstoke UK and New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Young Oran R. 2002. The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change: Fit Interplay and Scale. Cambridge: MIT Press. ______. 1982. Resource Regimes: Natural Resources and Social Institutions. Berkeley: University of California Press. Young Oran R. and Marc A. Levy eds. 1999. The Effectiveness of International Environmental |
Similar Titles:
International Regime Conflicts on Sustainable Development Issues. Analyzing Incompatibilities at the Intersection of Trade and Environment
SARS and Global Governance: Implications of International Public Health Crises for Institutional Change
Between Drug Patents and Public Health: Values, Global Governance and Institutional Framework in International Political Economy
|
|