Citation

Environmental Inequality: Fact or Fiction?

Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles




STOP!

You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below.

View Document as HTML:
Click here to view the document

Abstract:

A growing body of literature examines whether the poor, working class, and people of color are disproportionately likely to live in environmentally hazardous neighborhoods, with mixed results. Some researchers suggest that methodological weaknesses are to blame for inconsistent findings. In order to address these concerns, we use individual-level data from the 1995 Community, Crime, and Health Survey (Ross and Britt, co-PIs) linked with 1990 U.S. Census data and 1995 Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) data. Using these data we are able to test whether individual characteristics are related to hazard exposure, as population characteristics have been in many previous studies. We also examine whether patterns of environmental inequality that exist in urban areas hold up in suburban and rural areas, using multiple measures of environmental hazards. Being Hispanic and family income are more consistent predictors of waste exposure than race, although race also matters. While the impacts of individual’s race and family income are explained by neighborhoods characteristics, the association between being Hispanic and waste exposure is not. We find less inequality in the distribution of waste in metropolitan Chicago than in the rest of Illinois. Income does not explain racial or ethnic inequality.

Most Common Document Word Stems:

environment (86), respond (77), tract (62), hazard (56), facil (51), wast (48), studi (47), b (41), percent (41), communiti (39), incom (38), 000 (37), p (37), live (36), tabl (36), health (35), 1 (35), race (32), characterist (32), survey (31), area (30),

Author's Keywords:

environmental inequality
Convention
All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

Association:
Name: American Sociological Association
URL:
http://www.asanet.org


Citation:
URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p183865_index.html
Direct Link:
HTML Code:

MLA Citation:

Van Willigen, Marieke., Edwards, Bob. and Lewis, Shannon. "Environmental Inequality: Fact or Fiction?" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, TBA, New York, New York City, Aug 11, 2007 <Not Available>. 2009-05-24 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p183865_index.html>

APA Citation:

Van Willigen, M. M., Edwards, B. and Lewis, S. M. , 2007-08-11 "Environmental Inequality: Fact or Fiction?" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, TBA, New York, New York City Online <PDF>. 2009-05-24 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p183865_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Abstract: A growing body of literature examines whether the poor, working class, and people of color are disproportionately likely to live in environmentally hazardous neighborhoods, with mixed results. Some researchers suggest that methodological weaknesses are to blame for inconsistent findings. In order to address these concerns, we use individual-level data from the 1995 Community, Crime, and Health Survey (Ross and Britt, co-PIs) linked with 1990 U.S. Census data and 1995 Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) data. Using these data we are able to test whether individual characteristics are related to hazard exposure, as population characteristics have been in many previous studies. We also examine whether patterns of environmental inequality that exist in urban areas hold up in suburban and rural areas, using multiple measures of environmental hazards. Being Hispanic and family income are more consistent predictors of waste exposure than race, although race also matters. While the impacts of individual’s race and family income are explained by neighborhoods characteristics, the association between being Hispanic and waste exposure is not. We find less inequality in the distribution of waste in metropolitan Chicago than in the rest of Illinois. Income does not explain racial or ethnic inequality.

Get this Document:

Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.

Associated Document Available Access Fee All Academic Inc.
Associated Document Available Access Fee American Sociological Association

Document Type: PDF
Page count: 26
Word count: 6167
Text sample:
Table 1: Descriptive Statistics for Study Sample and Excluded Respondents (Community Crime and Health Survey) Environmental Inequality: Fact or Fiction? Marieke Van Willigen Bob Edwards and Shannon Lewis East Carolina University Contact Information: Marieke Van Willigen Ph.D. Associate Professor 406A Brewster Department of Sociology East Carolina University Greenville NC 27858 (252) 328-6092 vanwilligenm@mail.ecu.edu Abstract A growing body of literature examines whether the poor working class and people of color are disproportionately likely to live in environmentally hazardous neighborhoods with
-.000** -.089 Unit Value (.000) Percent Persons -.73*** -.497 In Urban Areas (.04) Constant 143.49*** 145.65*** 125.72*** (8.94) (9.93) (8.97) R-Squared .014 .013 .396 F-Statistic 41.521*** 35.609*** 67.306*** *** significant at p<.001 ** p<.01 * p<.05 + p<.10 a. With the exclusion of the percent persons in urban areas measure the tract level independent variables are deviation scores from the mean.


Similar Titles:
Discovering Rare Urban Populations for Community Health Surveys: Area Probability vs. GIS-based Telephone Sampling Approaches

Survey non-response in a national area probability sample as a dimension of survey quality; an analysis of community characteristics

The Waste is a Terrible Thing to Mind: The Changing Nature of Local Opposition to Low-level Radioactive Waste Facilities

Asking About Race: Survey Question Design for Respondents with Multiple Race Identities

Neighborhood Environment, Individual Resources, and Health in Older Adults: Chicago Health, Aging, and Social Relations Study


 
All Academic, Inc. is your premier source for research and conference management. Visit our website, www.allacademic.com, to see how we can help you today.