Citation

Edward Shils Turn Against Karl Mannheim: The Central European Connection

Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles




STOP!

You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below.

View Document as HTML:
Click here to view the document

Abstract:

Edward Shils, as a graduate student and instructor at the University of Chicago in the late 1930s, accepted the bleak prognosis of Karl Mannheim's Mensch und Gesellschaft im Zeitalter des Umbaus--which an enthralled Shils had translated into English. During the war, however, Shils came to reject Mannheims gloomy, dissensual analysis of modernity. This paper argues that Shils dismissal of Mannheim drew significantly upon a direct and explicit intellectual assault by fellow emigres to England. During the war--even while he maintained regular contact with Mannheim--Shils was exposed to an often vituperative dismissal of Mannheims work by Karl Popper and Friedrich Hayek, in the pages of the London School of Economics journal Economica. After the war, when both Popper and Shils joined the LSE faculty--Hayeks affiliation dated to 1931--Shils encounter with their critiques was deepened. And in these early postwar years, Shils became close friends with yet another emigre Mannheim critic, Michael Polanyi. Combined, these sustained and sophisticated criticisms helped wrest Shils from his interwar, Mannheim-friendly intellectual coordinates.

Most Common Document Word Stems:

mannheim (198), shil (174), intellectu (70), popper (59), social (58), polanyi (58), karl (55), hayek (55), sociolog (50), societi (49), liber (38), ibid (38), scienc (35), knowledg (31), lse (27), year (27), econom (27), war (26), school (26), tradit (26), london (25),

Author's Keywords:

Edward Shils, Karl Mannheim, history of sociology
Convention
Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

Association:
Name: American Sociological Association
URL:
http://www.asanet.org


Citation:
URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p185109_index.html
Direct Link:
HTML Code:

MLA Citation:

Pooley, Jefferson. "Edward Shils Turn Against Karl Mannheim: The Central European Connection" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, TBA, New York, New York City, Aug 11, 2007 <Not Available>. 2009-05-24 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p185109_index.html>

APA Citation:

Pooley, J. , 2007-08-11 "Edward Shils Turn Against Karl Mannheim: The Central European Connection" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, TBA, New York, New York City Online <APPLICATION/PDF>. 2009-05-24 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p185109_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Abstract: Edward Shils, as a graduate student and instructor at the University of Chicago in the late 1930s, accepted the bleak prognosis of Karl Mannheim's Mensch und Gesellschaft im Zeitalter des Umbaus--which an enthralled Shils had translated into English. During the war, however, Shils came to reject Mannheims gloomy, dissensual analysis of modernity. This paper argues that Shils dismissal of Mannheim drew significantly upon a direct and explicit intellectual assault by fellow emigres to England. During the war--even while he maintained regular contact with Mannheim--Shils was exposed to an often vituperative dismissal of Mannheims work by Karl Popper and Friedrich Hayek, in the pages of the London School of Economics journal Economica. After the war, when both Popper and Shils joined the LSE faculty--Hayeks affiliation dated to 1931--Shils encounter with their critiques was deepened. And in these early postwar years, Shils became close friends with yet another emigre Mannheim critic, Michael Polanyi. Combined, these sustained and sophisticated criticisms helped wrest Shils from his interwar, Mannheim-friendly intellectual coordinates.

Get this Document:

Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.

Associated Document Available Access Fee All Academic Inc.
Associated Document Available Access Fee American Sociological Association

Document Type: application/pdf
Page count: 22
Word count: 10487
Text sample:
Edward Shils was an undergraduate at the University of Pennsylvania when Karl Mannheim published Ideologie und Utopie (1929) [Ideology and Utopia]. “I was dimly aware of the great commotion which it set going in Germany ” he recalled years later.1 By 1932 Mannheim was still “terra incognita” to Shils— but this would change dramatically once Shils took up an assistantship under Louis Wirth at the University of Chicago in 1933. Soon after Shils became de facto translator of the
and the United States he underestimated no less the ramshackle obduracy of such countries as Great Britain France the Netherlands and the United States in their tenacious devotion to liberal democratic traditions” (229). 113. "Ideology and Utopia by Karl Mannheim” 86 89. 114. Shils: “His continuous insistence that the ‘internalist’ (ideological) view is wrong and his failure to recognize how much of it he himself retained led to his failure to perceive the partial autonomy of intellectual traditions and


Similar Titles:
Overlaps and Disconnects: Race and Social Movements in Political Sociology and Political Science

The Iconoclastic Analyses of Pierre Bourdieu on Intellectuals, Social Science, and Politics in Contemporary Society


 
All Academic, Inc. is your premier source for research and conference management. Visit our website, www.allacademic.com, to see how we can help you today.