All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Authoritarianism, History and Politics in the American South
Unformatted Document Text:  Introduction Politics in the American South evidences both change and continuity in the 21 st century. The overriding change is the shift of many Southern whites out of the Democratic Party and into the Republican Party (Black and Black 1987, 2002; Glaser 2005). This change is so pronounced that in four of the past seven presidential elections (1984, 1988, 2000 and 2004), Democratic candidates have received no electoral votes in the 13 Southern states, the 11 former Confederate states plus Kentucky and Oklahoma, and carried only one state in 1980 and a minority of electoral votes in Bill Clinton’s wins in 1992 and 1996. Furthermore, even after nationwide gains in the 2006 elections, Democrats hold only 5 of 26, or 19% of, Southern U.S. Senate seats, and 57 of 142, or 40% of, Southern U.S. House seats. Democratic gains in 2006 were concentrated in the Northeast and Midwest (Klinkner and Schaller 2006). In some Southern states, notably Texas, South Carolina, Georgia and Florida, Democrats are virtually irrelevant in state politics as well. The continuity, I argue, is this: White Southerners, always hegemonic in defining the region’s history, politics and culture, frequently demonstrate, and have demonstrated, strikingly strong resistance to diversity. While Southern white party loyalties have switched from majority Democratic to majority Republican, intolerance of difference appears woven into the region’s political and social fabric, more so than in other regions. This observation draws substantial support from historical studies (Goldfield 2002), and other research examining specific elements of Southern culture, i.e. the Southern culture of honor (Nisbett and Cohen 1996), Southern Baptist and other evangelical Protestant religious traditions (Rosenberg 1989; Smith 1997; Green et al. 2003), and hostility toward organized labor (Clark 1997; Minchin 2006). An intolerance of difference and 2

Authors: Slocum, Fred.
first   previous   Page 2 of 31   next   last



background image
Introduction
Politics in the American South evidences both change and continuity in the 21
st
century.
The overriding change is the shift of many Southern whites out of the Democratic Party
and into the Republican Party (Black and Black 1987, 2002; Glaser 2005). This change
is so pronounced that in four of the past seven presidential elections (1984, 1988, 2000
and 2004), Democratic candidates have received no electoral votes in the 13 Southern
states, the 11 former Confederate states plus Kentucky and Oklahoma, and carried only
one state in 1980 and a minority of electoral votes in Bill Clinton’s wins in 1992 and
1996. Furthermore, even after nationwide gains in the 2006 elections, Democrats hold
only 5 of 26, or 19% of, Southern U.S. Senate seats, and 57 of 142, or 40% of, Southern
U.S. House seats. Democratic gains in 2006 were concentrated in the Northeast and
Midwest (Klinkner and Schaller 2006). In some Southern states, notably Texas, South
Carolina, Georgia and Florida, Democrats are virtually irrelevant in state politics as well.
The continuity, I argue, is this: White Southerners, always hegemonic in defining
the region’s history, politics and culture, frequently demonstrate, and have demonstrated,
strikingly strong resistance to diversity. While Southern white party loyalties have
switched from majority Democratic to majority Republican, intolerance of difference
appears woven into the region’s political and social fabric, more so than in other regions.
This observation draws substantial support from historical studies (Goldfield 2002), and
other research examining specific elements of Southern culture, i.e. the Southern culture
of honor (Nisbett and Cohen 1996), Southern Baptist and other evangelical Protestant
religious traditions (Rosenberg 1989; Smith 1997; Green et al. 2003), and hostility
toward organized labor (Clark 1997; Minchin 2006). An intolerance of difference and
2


Convention
Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 2 of 31   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.