Author's Keywords: public information, information sources, expertise, trustworthiness, communication	Convention All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting. Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! Click here for more information.
Association: Name: International Society of Political Psychology URL: http://ispp.org
Citation: URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p204788_index.html Direct Link: HTML Code:

Ter Mors, Emma., Weenig, Mieneke., Ellemers, Naomi. and Daamen, Dancker. "Public information: On the effectiveness of multiple versus single information sources" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, Classical Chinese Garden, Portland, Oregon USA, Jul 04, 2007 <Not Available>. 2009-05-24 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p204788_index.html>

Ter Mors, E. , Weenig, M. , Ellemers, N. and Daamen, D. , 2007-07-04 "Public information: On the effectiveness of multiple versus single information sources" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, Classical Chinese Garden, Portland, Oregon USA Online <APPLICATION/PDF>. 2009-05-24 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p204788_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Abstract: In an experiment (N = 66) we tested the effectiveness of public information provided by multiple sources against that of single sources. We also examined whether such a combined communication by multiple sources would affect people’s perceptions of information sources in terms of expertise and trustworthiness. The study revealed that before reading the public information, participants anticipated the information to be of higher quality when an environmental NGO and an oil company provided the information together than when either of these organizations provided the information. Post-information evaluations revealed a comparable pattern. Moreover, the study revealed that perceptions of the environmental organization and the oil company were not affected by the combined communication in a positive or negative way.

Time to Warn the Surgeon General?: Public Information Officers’ and Journalists’ Perceived Barriers to Providing Excellent Health Information

Perceived Effects of Information and Communication Technology Adoption on Quality of Work Life: An Exploratory Study

Public vs. Private: The Conditional Effect of State Policy and Institutional Trust on Civic Perceptions

Public Attitudes About Political Participation on the Internet: Do People Perceive Political Activities Performed Online and Offline to be Equally Effective?