 |
Accountability and Teacher Candidates' Impact on P-12 Student Learning during Student Teaching
| |
| | Unformatted Document Text:
Darling-Hammond, L., & Loewenberg-Ball, D. (1997). Teaching higher standards: What
policy makers need to know and be able to do (on line). //www.negp.gov/reports/highstds.htm.
French, R. (2002). Linking teacher quality to student achievement. In A. R. Poliakoff
(Ed.), Teacher preparation: Assessing teacher quality, administrative support, standards-based teacher preparation. Basic Education, 46(10), 12-16.
Girod, G. R. (2002). (Ed.). Connecting teaching and learning: A handbook for teacher
educators on teacher work samples methodology (pp. 5-33). Washington, D.C.: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
Hamel, F. L., & Merz, C. (2005). Reframing accountability: A preservice program
wrestles with mandated reform, Journal of Teacher Education, 56, 157-167.
Harris, L. B., Salzman, S., Frantz, A., Newsome, J., & Martin, M. (2000). Using
accountability measures in the preparation of preservice teachers to make a difference in the learning of all students. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, Chicago, IL.
Hegler, K. L. (2003). Evaluating the use of teacher work samples to describe teacher
candidate competence and PK-12 learning. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, New Orleans, LA.
Keese, N., & Brown, T. (2003). Student teacher input and teacher work sample as part of
a teacher education unit accountability system. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association of Teacher Educators, Santa Fe, NM.
Myton, D.V., Nagel, N. G., & Osterman, D. (1991). Worksamples: A focus on student
learning. The Oregon Conference Monograph. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon.
Vaughn, M., & Everhart, B. (2005). A process analysis of predictors on an assessment
continuum of licensure candidates’ success in K-12 classrooms. Research for Educational Reform, 10(1), 3-15.
|
| | Authors: Platt, Jennifer., Hewitt, Scott. and Leinsing, Donna. |
|
| |
|
|
Darling-Hammond, L., & Loewenberg-Ball, D. (1997). Teaching higher standards: What
policy makers need to know and be able to do (on line).
//www.negp.gov/reports/highstds.htm.
French, R. (2002). Linking teacher quality to student achievement. In A. R. Poliakoff
(Ed.), Teacher preparation: Assessing teacher quality, administrative support,
standards-based teacher preparation. Basic Education, 46(10), 12-16.
Girod, G. R. (2002). (Ed.). Connecting teaching and learning: A handbook for teacher
educators on teacher work samples methodology (pp. 5-33). Washington, D.C.:
American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
Hamel, F. L., & Merz, C. (2005). Reframing accountability: A preservice program
wrestles with mandated reform, Journal of Teacher Education, 56, 157-167.
Harris, L. B., Salzman, S., Frantz, A., Newsome, J., & Martin, M. (2000). Using
accountability measures in the preparation of preservice teachers to make a
difference in the learning of all students. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting
of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, Chicago, IL.
Hegler, K. L. (2003). Evaluating the use of teacher work samples to describe teacher
candidate competence and PK-12 learning. Paper presented at the Annual
Meeting of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, New
Orleans, LA.
Keese, N., & Brown, T. (2003). Student teacher input and teacher work sample as part of
a teacher education unit accountability system. Paper presented at the Annual
Meeting of the Association of Teacher Educators, Santa Fe, NM.
Myton, D.V., Nagel, N. G., & Osterman, D. (1991). Worksamples: A focus on student
learning. The Oregon Conference Monograph. Eugene, OR: University of
Oregon.
Vaughn, M., & Everhart, B. (2005). A process analysis of predictors on an assessment
continuum of licensure candidates’ success in K-12 classrooms. Research for
Educational Reform, 10(1), 3-15.
|
|
 Convention | | Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting. | | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. | | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! | | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! | | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. | | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! | | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
