Citation

Elite of the Elite? Power and Women’s Appointment to Cabinets in Post-Industrial and Recently Democratized Nations

Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles




STOP!

You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below.

View Document as HTML:
Click here to view the document

Abstract:

With the large number of transitions away from authoritarian rule in the late twentieth century and the seeming “triumph” of democratic government, a good deal of recent scholarship has focused on the performance and quality of democracy in both new established and long-standing democratic systems. Recent works by Lijphart (1999) and Powell (2000), as well as Birchfield and Crepaz (1988) and Anderson and Guillory (1997), examine the impact of political institutions in producing variations in performance, looking specifically at how well different institutional designs provide representation and outcomes consistent with the desires of the public.

One area of performance where both new and more established democracies vary substantially is the number of women holding positions of power in both elective and appointive governmental positions. The number of women serving in the parliaments of advanced industrialized democracies, for example, averaged only 21% in 2001 and ranged from 7.3% to 42.7% (IPU 2002). The number of women in appointive positions, the “elite of the elite,” shows an even broader variation, ranging from 0% to 50% in the late 1990’s (United Nations 2002, Siaroff 2000). And this impressive span of variation has continued into the 21st Century, with 31 parliamentary or quasi-parliamentary democracies producing a low of 0% women in cabinets and a high of 47% while averaging 22% women holding portfolios overall (Katz and Koole 2002).

Only a very few scholars have investigated the causes of this cross-national gap in women’s representation in cabinets. While these studies are helpful in beginning to identify some of the determinants that influence the number of women appointed to cabinet-level positions, they are generally limited to case studies, small-n studies, or focus on only one point in time. Given the increase in the number of women serving in the cabinets of the industrialized democracies during the last twenty-five years, however, accounting for both differences occurring cross-nationally and over time is essential. This paper will therefore examine the determinants of women’s representation at the cabinet level in both long-established and more recently formed democracies. For the former, using a pooled cross-sectional time-series analysis for the years 1994 and 1998, we will evaluate the importance of different factors on women’s appointment to the cabinets of 20 post-industrial democracies, paying special attention to the role that different institutional structures play in producing differing levels of women’s representation in the executive branch. Additionally, we will analyze a broader sample of democracies at various stages of development for the years 1994, 1998 and 2005.

Most Common Document Word Stems:

women (183), cabinet (71), represent (53), parti (51), polit (51), appoint (48), democraci (43), govern (36), level (36), system (32), parliament (30), consensus (27), posit (27), influenc (27), 1997 (26), 1994 (25), institut (25), 2002 (24), 1999 (22), execut (21), variabl (20),
Convention
Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

Association:
Name: Southern Political Science Association
URL:
http://www.spsa.net


Citation:
URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p208362_index.html
Direct Link:
HTML Code:

MLA Citation:

Slocum-Schaffer, Stephanie. and Bohrer II, Robert. "Elite of the Elite? Power and Women’s Appointment to Cabinets in Post-Industrial and Recently Democratized Nations" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Hotel Intercontinental, New Orleans, LA, Jan 09, 2008 <Not Available>. 2009-05-23 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p208362_index.html>

APA Citation:

Slocum-Schaffer, S. A. and Bohrer II, R. E. , 2008-01-09 "Elite of the Elite? Power and Women’s Appointment to Cabinets in Post-Industrial and Recently Democratized Nations" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Hotel Intercontinental, New Orleans, LA Online <PDF>. 2009-05-23 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p208362_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Abstract: With the large number of transitions away from authoritarian rule in the late twentieth century and the seeming “triumph” of democratic government, a good deal of recent scholarship has focused on the performance and quality of democracy in both new established and long-standing democratic systems. Recent works by Lijphart (1999) and Powell (2000), as well as Birchfield and Crepaz (1988) and Anderson and Guillory (1997), examine the impact of political institutions in producing variations in performance, looking specifically at how well different institutional designs provide representation and outcomes consistent with the desires of the public.

One area of performance where both new and more established democracies vary substantially is the number of women holding positions of power in both elective and appointive governmental positions. The number of women serving in the parliaments of advanced industrialized democracies, for example, averaged only 21% in 2001 and ranged from 7.3% to 42.7% (IPU 2002). The number of women in appointive positions, the “elite of the elite,” shows an even broader variation, ranging from 0% to 50% in the late 1990’s (United Nations 2002, Siaroff 2000). And this impressive span of variation has continued into the 21st Century, with 31 parliamentary or quasi-parliamentary democracies producing a low of 0% women in cabinets and a high of 47% while averaging 22% women holding portfolios overall (Katz and Koole 2002).

Only a very few scholars have investigated the causes of this cross-national gap in women’s representation in cabinets. While these studies are helpful in beginning to identify some of the determinants that influence the number of women appointed to cabinet-level positions, they are generally limited to case studies, small-n studies, or focus on only one point in time. Given the increase in the number of women serving in the cabinets of the industrialized democracies during the last twenty-five years, however, accounting for both differences occurring cross-nationally and over time is essential. This paper will therefore examine the determinants of women’s representation at the cabinet level in both long-established and more recently formed democracies. For the former, using a pooled cross-sectional time-series analysis for the years 1994 and 1998, we will evaluate the importance of different factors on women’s appointment to the cabinets of 20 post-industrial democracies, paying special attention to the role that different institutional structures play in producing differing levels of women’s representation in the executive branch. Additionally, we will analyze a broader sample of democracies at various stages of development for the years 1994, 1998 and 2005.

Get this Document:

Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.

Associated Document Available Southern Political Science Association
Abstract Only All Academic Inc.
Associated Document Available Political Research Online

Document Type: PDF
Page count: 26
Word count: 6157
Text sample:
How Much Progress? Women’s Representation at the Cabinet Level* Robert E. Bohrer II Stephanie A. Slocum-Schaffer Department of Political Science Department of Political Science Gettysburg College Shepherd University 300 N. Washington St. Box 406 Box 3210 Gettysburg PA 17325 Shepherdstown WV 25443-3210 Phone: 717-337-6042 Phone: 304-876-5347 Email: rbohrer@gettysburg.edu Email: sslocums@shepherd.edu *Prepared for delivery at the 2008 Annual Meeting of the Southern Political Science Association January 10-12 2008. Copyright by the Southern Political Science Association. Introduction With the large number
25 Table 4: Women & Cabinet in 33 Democracies 1994 1998 & 2005 Unstandardized Robust Standard Variable Coefficient Error Women in Parliament 0.480*** 0.183 Women in Workforce 0.779*** 0.188 GDPCAP 0.00006 0.0001 Suffrage -0.0453 0.088 Consensus -1.357 * 0.904 Constant -9.41 7.02 R2 = .59 N = 95 *p<.10 ** p< .05 *** p<.01 (one-tailed) 26


Similar Titles:
The Effects of Political Party Systems and Ethnic Diversity on Level of Democracy

Grafting participatory governance onto representative democracy and existing state institutions: Explaining outcomes via political society and civil society lenses

Women's Representation and Political Party System Change in the Russian Regional Assemblies Under Federal Executive Dominance


 
All Academic, Inc. is your premier source for research and conference management. Visit our website, www.allacademic.com, to see how we can help you today.