|
|
|
|
The Democratic Party Coalition: A Social Network Analysis of Leadership PACs, Party Committees and Interest Groups |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
This paper begins with the premise that political party organizations should be treated as open, fluid networks of actors who compete with each other for control over their collective agenda. It then examines nomination contests for evidence of factional conflict among interest groups in the Democratic party. The paper defines factions to be durable coalitions of different actors that try to influence the party's internal organization, and have some rational basis for doing so. Examining the 2002 congressional primary candidates that were supported by Democratic party-oriented Political Action Committees, it finds that there is a consensus on one primary candidate in about 70% of open primary races. This finding undermines the conventional wisdom that Democrats are frequently deeply divided, especially in primaries. In the races where these PACs do not support the same primary candidate, exploratory analysis hints at some discernible groupings, though not necessarily factions per se. The paper concludes that more work needs to be done defining the boundaries of the Expanded Party, and defining and measuring faction. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
parti (219), group (197), pac (156), 100 (132), candid (114), faction (113), democrat (81), primari (77), support (62), race (44), elect (42), polit (40), issu (38), 1 (38), one (37), organ (36), right (36), give (33), interest (32), tabl (31), might (29), |
Author's Keywords:
|
political party, Democratic party, primary election, PAC, campaign finance, faction |
|
 | Convention | | All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Dominguez, Casey. "The Democratic Party Coalition: A Social Network Analysis of Leadership PACs, Party Committees and Interest Groups" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hyatt Regency Chicago and the Sheraton Chicago Hotel and Towers, Chicago, IL, Aug 30, 2007 <Not Available>. 2009-05-27 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p210096_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Dominguez, C. B. , 2007-08-30 "The Democratic Party Coalition: A Social Network Analysis of Leadership PACs, Party Committees and Interest Groups" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hyatt Regency Chicago and the Sheraton Chicago Hotel and Towers, Chicago, IL Online <APPLICATION/PDF>. 2009-05-27 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p210096_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Abstract: This paper begins with the premise that political party organizations should be treated as open, fluid networks of actors who compete with each other for control over their collective agenda. It then examines nomination contests for evidence of factional conflict among interest groups in the Democratic party. The paper defines factions to be durable coalitions of different actors that try to influence the party's internal organization, and have some rational basis for doing so. Examining the 2002 congressional primary candidates that were supported by Democratic party-oriented Political Action Committees, it finds that there is a consensus on one primary candidate in about 70% of open primary races. This finding undermines the conventional wisdom that Democrats are frequently deeply divided, especially in primaries. In the races where these PACs do not support the same primary candidate, exploratory analysis hints at some discernible groupings, though not necessarily factions per se. The paper concludes that more work needs to be done defining the boundaries of the Expanded Party, and defining and measuring faction. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
application/pdf |
| Page count: |
44 |
| Word count: |
9760 |
| Text sample: |
| The Democratic Party Coalition: Pre-Nomination Behavior of Leadership PACs Party Committees and Interest Groups Casey B. K. Dominguez Department of Political Science and International Relations University of San Diego caseydominguez@sandiego.edu This paper begins with the premise that political party organizations should be treated as open fluid networks of actors who compete with each other for control over their collective agenda. It then examines nomination contests for evidence of factional conflict among interest groups in the Democratic party. The paper |
| Senate 1 FL 25 1 SC 03 1 GA 03 4 SD 01 5 GA 11 3 TN Senate 2 GA 12 8 TN 04 3 GA 13 4 TN 05 6 IL 05 10 Tn 07 1 43 IN 02 5 TX Senate 5 IA 05 1 TX 05 3 LA 05 1 TX 25 4 ME 02 7 TX 26 1 MD 02 2 TX 31 1 MI 10 2 UT 01 5 MI 11 1 44 |
Similar Titles:
The Relationship Between Political Parties and Interest Groups: Patterns of Interest Group Contributions
Race and Ethnic Differences in Religious Based Political Behavior: Is the Religious Right Just Another Political Interest Group?
|
|