Citation

Electoral Politics and Vote Cleavages in a New Democracy: Split Ticket Voting in Nicaragua's 2006 Presidential Election

Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles



Abstract:

In November, 2006, the leftist Sandinista Party and Daniel Ortega won back the presidential office of Nicaragua, after sixteen years in the opposition. However, the Ortega victory was based on a slender plurality of 38% which now requires Ortega and his Sandinista party to work to build a coalitional government in cooperation with a powerful single-chamber legislature where the Sandinistas do not hold a majority of seats. Analysis of the 2006 legislative vote shows that the hard-core Sandinista left witnessed very little split ticket voting in which voters supported Ortega for the presidency and some other party in the legislature. However, all the other parties who ran candidates in the 2006 election experienced some split ticket voting and this pattern was particularly predominant among supporters of the two centrist candidates, Eduardo Montealegre of the National Liberal Alliance and the Herty Lewites/Edmundo Jarquin ticket of the Sandinista Renovating Movement.

This paper uses the analysis of split ticket voting and other types of ambivalence toward a presidential choice to explore lines of cleavage and other opinion differences within the Nicaraguan electorate in the 2006 election. In a setting where split ticket voting is normally absent and is not generally studied, this analysis shows that voters who planned to split their vote or who considered doing so early in the electoral campaign represent a new kind of voter who may be more thoughtful and selective in his/her vote choice, less ideologically rigid, and who may be interested in moving away from polarized politics and toward a politics of greater policy pragmatism. Split ticket voting thus may be a sign of movement toward moderation in partisan sentiments that could foster a lessening of extremist divisions and a step forward toward democratic consolidation.
Convention
Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

Association:
Name: Southern Political Science Association
URL:
http://www.spsa.net


Citation:
URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p228576_index.html
Direct Link:
HTML Code:

MLA Citation:

Anderson, Leslie. and Dodd, Lawrence. "Electoral Politics and Vote Cleavages in a New Democracy: Split Ticket Voting in Nicaragua's 2006 Presidential Election" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Hotel Intercontinental, New Orleans, LA, <Not Available>. 2009-05-23 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p228576_index.html>

APA Citation:

Anderson, L. E. and Dodd, L. C. "Electoral Politics and Vote Cleavages in a New Democracy: Split Ticket Voting in Nicaragua's 2006 Presidential Election" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Hotel Intercontinental, New Orleans, LA <Not Available>. 2009-05-23 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p228576_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Abstract: In November, 2006, the leftist Sandinista Party and Daniel Ortega won back the presidential office of Nicaragua, after sixteen years in the opposition. However, the Ortega victory was based on a slender plurality of 38% which now requires Ortega and his Sandinista party to work to build a coalitional government in cooperation with a powerful single-chamber legislature where the Sandinistas do not hold a majority of seats. Analysis of the 2006 legislative vote shows that the hard-core Sandinista left witnessed very little split ticket voting in which voters supported Ortega for the presidency and some other party in the legislature. However, all the other parties who ran candidates in the 2006 election experienced some split ticket voting and this pattern was particularly predominant among supporters of the two centrist candidates, Eduardo Montealegre of the National Liberal Alliance and the Herty Lewites/Edmundo Jarquin ticket of the Sandinista Renovating Movement.

This paper uses the analysis of split ticket voting and other types of ambivalence toward a presidential choice to explore lines of cleavage and other opinion differences within the Nicaraguan electorate in the 2006 election. In a setting where split ticket voting is normally absent and is not generally studied, this analysis shows that voters who planned to split their vote or who considered doing so early in the electoral campaign represent a new kind of voter who may be more thoughtful and selective in his/her vote choice, less ideologically rigid, and who may be interested in moving away from polarized politics and toward a politics of greater policy pragmatism. Split ticket voting thus may be a sign of movement toward moderation in partisan sentiments that could foster a lessening of extremist divisions and a step forward toward democratic consolidation.

Get this Document:

Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.

Associated Document Available Southern Political Science Association
Abstract Only All Academic Inc.
Associated Document Available Political Research Online


Similar Titles:
Strategic Considerations or “Cognitive Madisonianism”: The Sources of Split-ticket Voting in the 2006 Mexican Presidential Elections.

Social Networks in the 2006 Mexican Elections: Why is Voting Behavior so Regionalized in Mexico? Political Discussion and Electoral Choice in 2006


 
All Academic, Inc. is your premier source for research and conference management. Visit our website, www.allacademic.com, to see how we can help you today.