Convention Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote! Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! Click here for more information.
Association: Name: American Psychology - Law Society URL: http://www.ap-ls.org/
Citation: URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p229155_index.html Direct Link: HTML Code:

Swanner, Jessica., Lawson, Deah., Beike, Denise. and Neuschatz, Jeffrey. "Motivating Instruction’s Effect on Coerced and Voluntary Confessions in Judicial Decision-Making" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychology - Law Society, Hyatt Regency Jacksonville Riverfront, Jacksonville, FL, Mar 05, 2008 <Not Available>. 2010-01-24 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p229155_index.html>

Swanner, J. , Lawson, D. , Beike, D. and Neuschatz, J. S. , 2008-03-05 "Motivating Instruction’s Effect on Coerced and Voluntary Confessions in Judicial Decision-Making" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychology - Law Society, Hyatt Regency Jacksonville Riverfront, Jacksonville, FL <Not Available>. 2010-01-24 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p229155_index.html

Publication Type: Poster Abstract: The present research investigates the use of motivating instructions to mitigate the biasing effects of coerced confessions. Participants read one of seven different versions of trial. Afterwards, they answered a questionnaire, which contained verdict decisions and confidence and voluntariness scores. The introduction of a coerced confession yielded more guilty verdicts than the control condition. Motivating instructions reduced the number of guilty verdicts relative to the no instructions conditions.

District Court Decision-Making Before and After U.S. v. Booker: The Effects of Legislative Action on Judicial Discretion

The Effect of Modified Judicial Instructions and Expert Testimony on Jury Perception of Secondary Confessions.

The Effects of Publicity on the Judicial Decision-Making in the Countries of the Former Soviet Union