Convention Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events! Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! Click here for more information.
Association: Name: American Psychology - Law Society URL: http://www.ap-ls.org/
Citation: URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p229696_index.html Direct Link: HTML Code:

Domitrovich, Stephanie., Merlino, Mara. and Richardson, James. "Court-Appointed Experts in State Trial Courts" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychology - Law Society, Hyatt Regency Jacksonville Riverfront, Jacksonville, FL, Mar 05, 2008 <Not Available>. 2009-05-23 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p229696_index.html>

Domitrovich, S. , Merlino, M. L. and Richardson, J. T. , 2008-03-05 "Court-Appointed Experts in State Trial Courts" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychology - Law Society, Hyatt Regency Jacksonville Riverfront, Jacksonville, FL <Not Available>. 2009-05-23 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p229696_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Abstract: This paper reports the results of a mail survey of 178 state court trial judges from Texas, Michigan, Indiana, and Arizona about their use of and opinions about court-appointed experts. Their reasons for choosing or declining to exercise their inherent power to appoint experts, the kinds of expert testimony most frequently seen by the judges in this sample, judges’ views of the costs and benefits associated with using court-appointed experts, and judges’ perceptions of court-appointed vs. privately-retained experts will be discussed in the context of implications for judges, attorneys, and experts.

The Effect of Judicial Audiences on the Behavior of State Trial Court Judges

Gubernatorial Influence in Elective States: Examining Interim Appointments to Courts of Last Resort

The Factors Affecting the Appointment of Experts by State Trial Judges: An Exploratory Study

The Conflicting Interest: State Legislators and the Supreme Court Justices They Appoint