Citation

Geographic Distance and Communication During Courtship: Examining Knowledge-Enhancing Talk

Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles




STOP!

You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below.

View Document as HTML:
Click here to view the document

Abstract:

This study explores the role of geographic distance in dating partners’ talk during courtship. Results indicate partners in long-distance dating relationships (LDDRs), relative to those in geographically-close dating relationships (GCDRs), engage in more intimacy-focused everyday speech events. Intimacy-focused interaction also comprises a larger proportion of LDDR partners’ everyday talk. LDDR partners, moreover, were found to dissipate taboo topic and conflict avoidance, as well as positive selective self-presentation, at slower rates throughout courtship. Similarly, LDDR partners appear less likely than GCDR partners to discuss (over time) what relational scholars identify as critical relational issues (e.g., views on marriage, family, and career) for informed relational escalation. We propose many LDDRs persist in a state of suspended partner knowledge acquisition, a kind of “uninformed interdependence”, whereby “knowledge-enhancing talk” occurs less frequently, and unfolds less readily over time.

Most Common Document Word Stems:

partner (139), relationship (135), communic (89), relat (83), talk (67), lddr (62), 2 (59), factor (58), topic (57), 1 (54), avoid (53), courtship (51), m (50), conflict (49), 3 (43), length (41), gcdr (41), self (38), distanc (35), interact (35), intimaci (35),

Author's Keywords:

interdependence, everyday talk, speech events, long-distance, geographic separation, courtship
Convention
All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

Association:
Name: International Communication Association
URL:
http://www.icahdq.org


Citation:
URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p230770_index.html
Direct Link:
HTML Code:

MLA Citation:

Stafford, Laura. and Merolla, Andy. "Geographic Distance and Communication During Courtship: Examining Knowledge-Enhancing Talk" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, TBA, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, May 21, 2008 <Not Available>. 2009-05-23 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p230770_index.html>

APA Citation:

Stafford, L. and Merolla, A. J. , 2008-05-21 "Geographic Distance and Communication During Courtship: Examining Knowledge-Enhancing Talk" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, TBA, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Online <PDF>. 2009-05-23 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p230770_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Abstract: This study explores the role of geographic distance in dating partners’ talk during courtship. Results indicate partners in long-distance dating relationships (LDDRs), relative to those in geographically-close dating relationships (GCDRs), engage in more intimacy-focused everyday speech events. Intimacy-focused interaction also comprises a larger proportion of LDDR partners’ everyday talk. LDDR partners, moreover, were found to dissipate taboo topic and conflict avoidance, as well as positive selective self-presentation, at slower rates throughout courtship. Similarly, LDDR partners appear less likely than GCDR partners to discuss (over time) what relational scholars identify as critical relational issues (e.g., views on marriage, family, and career) for informed relational escalation. We propose many LDDRs persist in a state of suspended partner knowledge acquisition, a kind of “uninformed interdependence”, whereby “knowledge-enhancing talk” occurs less frequently, and unfolds less readily over time.

Get this Document:

Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.

Associated Document Available Access Fee All Academic Inc.

Document Type: PDF
Page count: 37
Word count: 8120
Text sample:
Communication and Courtship 1 Running head: COMMUNICATION AND COURTSHIP Geographic Distance and Communication during Courtship Communication and Courtship 2 Abstract Utilizing interdependence theory the authors argue that the unique situational features of geographic separation affect the nature of dating partners’ talk throughout courtship. It is predicted that the communication of long-distance dating relationship (LDDR) partners relative to that of geographically-close dating relationship (GCDR) partners reflects greater intimacy conflict and topic avoidance and selective positive self-presentation. Also hypothesized is that
Communication Research 13 191-210. Stephen T.D. (1984). Symbolic interdependence and post-break-up distress: A reformulation of the attachment process. Journal of Divorce 1–17. Surra C. A. & Hughes D. K. (1997). Commitment processes in accounts of the development of premarital relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family 59 5-21. Theiss J. A. & Solomon D. H. (2006). A relational turbulence model of communication about irritations in romantic relationships Communication Research 35 395-418. Thibaut J. W. & Kelley H. H. (1959).


Similar Titles:
Understanding Relational Uncertainty, Communication Efficacy, and Avoidance Following Relational Partner’s Deception: The Mediating Role of Communication Efficacy

An Analysis of Relational Closeness, Mediated Communication, Everyday Talk, and Relational Maintenance among Sibling Relationships During the College Years

Mobile Communication in Romantic Relationships: The Relationship Between Mobile Phone Use and Relational Uncertainty, Intimacy, and Attachment

TOP PAPERS AND TOP STUDENT PAPERS: Mobile Communication in Romantic Relationships: The Relationship Between Mobile Phone Use and Relational Uncertainty, Intimacy, and Attachment


 
All Academic, Inc. is your premier source for research and conference management. Visit our website, www.allacademic.com, to see how we can help you today.