|
|
|
|
Drug Court Drop Outs: Do "Unsuccessful" Participants in Drug Treatment Show Signs of Success? |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
|
Abstract:
|
Prior research concerning drug courts focuses on graduates of the program and their success rates, defining success as graduation from the program. Anglin, D., Prendergast, M., & Farabee, D. (1998, July). The effect of coerced drug treatment for drug-abusing offenders. In contrast, the current study examines the effects of a participant's length of stay in a community-based treatment program on their likelihood to recidivate. Participants (N=161) were all those participants enrolled in a local drug court treatment program from a two year period. This included those who were successful in the program (graduates) and those who exited the program through any means but graduation (drop-out or removed). All participants in the program that exited the program through any means other than graduation were analyzed. Demographic and social control variables (e.g. religion, employment, etc.) were considered and held constant in determining whether time in the program affects recidivism rates. The most significant finding was that time in the program alone, reduces the likelihood of recidivism in both cohorts when controlling for demographic and social controls. Based on our findings, we suggest that drug courts may wish to increase the duration of their programs and redefine their explanations of success from one of absolutes and graduation to a more stratified definition, identifying recidivism as the main determinant of “success”. |
|
 | Convention | | All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: The Law and Society Association URL: http://www.lawandsociety.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Smith, Sven. and Kolnes, Ashley. "Drug Court Drop Outs: Do "Unsuccessful" Participants in Drug Treatment Show Signs of Success?" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the The Law and Society Association, Hilton Bonaventure, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, May 27, 2008 <Not Available>. 2009-05-23 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p236556_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Smith, S. and Kolnes, A. R. , 2008-05-27 "Drug Court Drop Outs: Do "Unsuccessful" Participants in Drug Treatment Show Signs of Success?" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the The Law and Society Association, Hilton Bonaventure, Montreal, Quebec, Canada <Not Available>. 2009-05-23 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p236556_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Abstract: Prior research concerning drug courts focuses on graduates of the program and their success rates, defining success as graduation from the program. Anglin, D., Prendergast, M., & Farabee, D. (1998, July). The effect of coerced drug treatment for drug-abusing offenders. In contrast, the current study examines the effects of a participant's length of stay in a community-based treatment program on their likelihood to recidivate. Participants (N=161) were all those participants enrolled in a local drug court treatment program from a two year period. This included those who were successful in the program (graduates) and those who exited the program through any means but graduation (drop-out or removed). All participants in the program that exited the program through any means other than graduation were analyzed. Demographic and social control variables (e.g. religion, employment, etc.) were considered and held constant in determining whether time in the program affects recidivism rates. The most significant finding was that time in the program alone, reduces the likelihood of recidivism in both cohorts when controlling for demographic and social controls. Based on our findings, we suggest that drug courts may wish to increase the duration of their programs and redefine their explanations of success from one of absolutes and graduation to a more stratified definition, identifying recidivism as the main determinant of “success”. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
Similar Titles:
Drug Court Participants and Their Children: How Drug Court Teams Evaluate the Quality of Parenting
Territoriality as Treatment: Spacial and Racial Implications of Drug Treatment Courts in Toronto and Vancouver
Treatment retention predictors of drug court participants in a Midwestern state.
The Stability of Attitudinal Versus Behavioral Indicators of Spirituality in the Prediction of Substance Use and Criminality in Kentucky Drug Court Participants
The Influence of Delaware Drug Court in Motivating Treatment Completion and Post-Treatment Success
|
|