All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Identifying Influences on States Abilities to Enact Environmental Justice Policies in the United States
Unformatted Document Text:  To better represent the various actions a state can take to address environmental injustice, we construct an ordinal variable based on a Guttman scale, with scores ranging from zero to five (Table 1). Guttman scales measure the extent to which a series of items is distributed unidimensionally (Guest 2000). “Guttman scaling, also known as scalogram analysis and cumulative scaling, is a procedure designed to order both items and subjects with respect to some underlying cumulative dimension” (McIver and Carmines 1981, p. 41). A perfect Guttman scale would consist of, in this case, each state having completed each level of action before they complete the “next” level of action. However, because a perfect relationship between scale score and item score is rarely achieved, this type of scale can be expected to have a certain level of error. Guttman (1950) designed a way to assess error, called the minimization of error. Minimization of error is measured by counting the least number of responses that must be changed to transform a response pattern to fit an ideal scale. As long as the coefficient of reproducibility (CR), a measure of the unidimensionality of the items in scale, has a value of .90 or higher a Guttman scale can be used (McIver and Carmines 1981). The formula below shows how the coefficient of reproducibility is calculated. CR = 1.0 – (# errors)/ [(# items) x (# respondents)] The scale score assignment is based upon the nearest ideal predicted response pattern (McIver and Carmines 1981). A Guttman scale is appropriate in the measurement of environmental justice policy because it does not merely count the number of actions a state has taken. It instead assigns those states that have completed higher levels of policy action a higher overall score. In a well- constructed scale, these states also would have taken lower levels of action. Therefore, a score of one is assigned to states that have completed an environmental justice study. A score of zero is assigned to states that have taken no action towards remedying environmental injustice. A score of two is assigned to states that have established an environmental justice commission or created an environmental justice office within one of their existing agencies. A score of three is assigned to states that have attempted to pass legislation aimed at addressing and alleviating TABLE 1: State Action towards Environmental Justice State Study Agency or Board Legislative Attempt Procedural Legislation Substantive Legislation Score 8

Authors: Robert, Patricia., Abel, Troy. and Salazar, Debra.
first   previous   Page 8 of 35   next   last



background image
To better represent the various actions a state can take to address environmental injustice,
we construct an ordinal variable based on a Guttman scale, with scores ranging from zero to five
(Table 1). Guttman scales measure the extent to which a series of items is distributed
unidimensionally (Guest 2000). “Guttman scaling, also known as scalogram analysis and
cumulative scaling, is a procedure designed to order both items and subjects with respect to some
underlying cumulative dimension” (McIver and Carmines 1981, p. 41). A perfect Guttman scale
would consist of, in this case, each state having completed each level of action before they
complete the “next” level of action. However, because a perfect relationship between scale score
and item score is rarely achieved, this type of scale can be expected to have a certain level of
error.
Guttman (1950) designed a way to assess error, called the minimization of error.
Minimization of error is measured by counting the least number of responses that must be
changed to transform a response pattern to fit an ideal scale. As long as the coefficient of
reproducibility (CR), a measure of the unidimensionality of the items in scale, has a value of .90
or higher a Guttman scale can be used (McIver and Carmines 1981). The formula below shows
how the coefficient of reproducibility is calculated.
CR = 1.0 – (# errors)/ [(# items) x (# respondents)]
The scale score assignment is based upon the nearest ideal predicted response pattern (McIver
and Carmines 1981).
A Guttman scale is appropriate in the measurement of environmental justice policy
because it does not merely count the number of actions a state has taken. It instead assigns those
states that have completed higher levels of policy action a higher overall score. In a well-
constructed scale, these states also would have taken lower levels of action. Therefore, a score
of one is assigned to states that have completed an environmental justice study. A score of zero
is assigned to states that have taken no action towards remedying environmental injustice. A
score of two is assigned to states that have established an environmental justice commission or
created an environmental justice office within one of their existing agencies. A score of three is
assigned to states that have attempted to pass legislation aimed at addressing and alleviating
TABLE 1: State Action towards Environmental Justice
State
Study
Agency
or
Board
Legislative
Attempt
Procedural
Legislation
Substantive
Legislation
Score
8


Convention
Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 8 of 35   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.