All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Between Balancing and Bandwagoning: A Game Theoretic Analysis of ASEAN's China Policy in the Post-Cold War Era
Unformatted Document Text:  In a nutshell, above discussion points out two points: (1) If both groups prioritize mutual cooperation over other options, the consensus among the ASEAN states can be easily reached as in Figure 3 and 4. If the two groups have the same strictly dominant strategy favoring cooperation, the consensus can definitely be accomplished. (2) If two groups have different priorities about mutual cooperation with regard to a certain proposal or issue, it will lead one group to compromise and seek for the second best payoff in an alternative proposal, if that group does not just reject the proposal. ASEAN-China Game Simulation This section attempts to apply the preceding models to explain the rationale of ASEAN’s policy toward China in the case of the South China Sea and the case of ACFTA agreement. The former case reveals the failure of ASEAN to take a collective hedging strategy; the latter indicates ASEAN’s success in taking an economic engagement (bandwagoning for profit) strategy. (1) The South China Sea Disputes Probably, the South China Sea dispute is the most noticeable flashpoint between China and ASEAN, even though now the tension between the two sides has greatly lessened. Nevertheless, this issue offers an appropriate case to examine ASEAN’s attitude toward China. Essentially, the South China Sea issue is not only a territorial dispute, but also is related to its potential huge oil resources and natural gas reserves. 13 Totally, five ASEAN states claim sovereignty over different areas in this region and both Taiwan and China claim to own the entire Spratly archipelago. China and Vietnam have several small scale military conflicts in 1974 and 1988. 14 China and 13 According to a moderate Chinese estimation, the potential oil resources of the Spratly and Paracel Islands could be as high as 105 billion barrels of oil. The whole region of the South China Sea could contain up to 213 billion barrels. See Rowan, Joshua P. 2005. The U.S.- Japan Security Alliance, ASEAN, and the South China Sea Dispute. Asian Survey 45 (3):414-436. 14 In 1988, China sank three Vietnamese vessels and caused about seventy deaths. 18

Authors: Chiou, Yi-hung. and Song, Young Hoon.
first   previous   Page 19 of 37   next   last



background image
In a nutshell, above discussion points out two points: (1) If both groups prioritize
mutual cooperation over other options, the consensus among the ASEAN states can be
easily reached as in Figure 3 and 4. If the two groups have the same strictly dominant
strategy favoring cooperation, the consensus can definitely be accomplished. (2) If
two groups have different priorities about mutual cooperation with regard to a certain
proposal or issue, it will lead one group to compromise and seek for the second best
payoff in an alternative proposal, if that group does not just reject the proposal.
ASEAN-China Game Simulation
This section attempts to apply the preceding models to explain the rationale of
ASEAN’s policy toward China in the case of the South China Sea and the case of
ACFTA agreement. The former case reveals the failure of ASEAN to take a collective
hedging strategy; the latter indicates ASEAN’s success in taking an economic
engagement (bandwagoning for profit) strategy.
(1)
The South China Sea Disputes
Probably, the South China Sea dispute is the most noticeable flashpoint between
China and ASEAN, even though now the tension between the two sides has greatly
lessened. Nevertheless, this issue offers an appropriate case to examine ASEAN’s
attitude toward China. Essentially, the South China Sea issue is not only a territorial
dispute, but also is related to its potential huge oil resources and natural gas
reserves.
Totally, five ASEAN states claim sovereignty over different areas in this
region and both Taiwan and China claim to own the entire Spratly archipelago. China
and Vietnam have several small scale military conflicts in 1974 and 1988.
China and
13
According to a moderate Chinese estimation, the potential oil resources of the Spratly and Paracel
Islands could be as high as 105 billion barrels of oil. The whole region of the South China Sea could
contain up to 213 billion barrels. See Rowan, Joshua P. 2005. The U.S.- Japan Security Alliance,
ASEAN, and the South China Sea Dispute. Asian Survey 45 (3):414-436.
14
In 1988, China sank three Vietnamese vessels and caused about seventy deaths.
18


Convention
Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 19 of 37   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.