All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

"You see me but it's not me:" The Interplay of Religious Authority and Lay Empowerment in Congregation-Based Community Organizing
Unformatted Document Text:  Lara Rusch ~ 39 knowledge, and efficacy, with currency outside of the church walls. As discussed above, the congregation’s process of joining and becoming active in collaborative bridging projects entails internal discussion and negotiation of authority. By understanding lay people as engaged in negotiation and influence within institutions, scholars can avoid theories that over-determine the power of religious authority, yet take it seriously as a contextual factor shaping opportunities for political action in communities. Even when congregations belong to a community organizing network, participation is a struggle to maintain, in competition with the inward pull of internal debates and other priorities. Bibliography Arendt, Hannah. 1961. Between Past and Future. New York: Viking. Booth, John A., and Patricia Bayer Richard. 1998a. Civil Society and Political Context in Central America. American Behavioral Scientist 42 (1):33-46. Booth, John A., and Patricia Bayer Richard. 1998b. Civil society, political capital, and democratization in Central America. Journal of Politics 60:780-800. Brown, R. Khari. 2006. Racial Differences in Congregation-based Political Activism. Social Forces 84 (3):1581-1604. Burns, Nancy, Kay Lehman Schlozman, and Sidney Verba. 2001. The private roots of public action: gender, equality, and political participation. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. DeFilippis, James. 2001. The Myth of Social Capital in Community Development. Housing Policy Debate 12 (4):781-806. Edwards, Bob, and Michael W. Foley. 1998. Civil Society and Social Capital Beyond Putnam. American Behavioral Scientist 42 (1):124-139. Evans, Sara M., and Harry Chatten Boyte. 1986. Free spaces: the sources of democratic change in America. 1st ed. New York: Harper & Row. Falbo, Toni, B. Lynn New, and Margie Gaines. 1987. Perceptions of Authority and the Power Strategies Used by Clergyman. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 26 (4):499-507. Feldman, Martha S. 1995. Strategies for Interpreting Qualitative Data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Foley, Michael W., and Bob Edwards. 1996. The Paradox of Civil Society. Journal of Democracy 7 (3):38-52. Gamm, Gerald. 1999. Urban Exodus: why the Jews left Boston and the Catholics stayed. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Authors: Rusch, Lara.
first   previous   Page 39 of 40   next   last



background image
Lara Rusch ~ 39
knowledge, and efficacy, with currency outside of the church walls. As discussed above,
the congregation’s process of joining and becoming active in collaborative bridging
projects entails internal discussion and negotiation of authority. By understanding lay
people as engaged in negotiation and influence within institutions, scholars can avoid
theories that over-determine the power of religious authority, yet take it seriously as a
contextual factor shaping opportunities for political action in communities. Even when
congregations belong to a community organizing network, participation is a struggle to
maintain, in competition with the inward pull of internal debates and other priorities.

Bibliography
Arendt, Hannah. 1961. Between Past and Future. New York: Viking.
Booth, John A., and Patricia Bayer Richard. 1998a. Civil Society and Political Context in
Central America. American Behavioral Scientist 42 (1):33-46.
Booth, John A., and Patricia Bayer Richard. 1998b. Civil society, political capital, and
democratization in Central America. Journal of Politics 60:780-800.
Brown, R. Khari. 2006. Racial Differences in Congregation-based Political Activism.
Social Forces 84 (3):1581-1604.
Burns, Nancy, Kay Lehman Schlozman, and Sidney Verba. 2001. The private roots of
public action: gender, equality, and political participation. Cambridge, Mass.:
Harvard University Press.
DeFilippis, James. 2001. The Myth of Social Capital in Community Development.
Housing Policy Debate 12 (4):781-806.
Edwards, Bob, and Michael W. Foley. 1998. Civil Society and Social Capital Beyond
Putnam. American Behavioral Scientist 42 (1):124-139.
Evans, Sara M., and Harry Chatten Boyte. 1986. Free spaces: the sources of democratic
change in America. 1st ed. New York: Harper & Row.
Falbo, Toni, B. Lynn New, and Margie Gaines. 1987. Perceptions of Authority and the
Power Strategies Used by Clergyman. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion
26 (4):499-507.
Feldman, Martha S. 1995. Strategies for Interpreting Qualitative Data. Thousand Oaks,
CA: Sage.
Foley, Michael W., and Bob Edwards. 1996. The Paradox of Civil Society. Journal of
Democracy 7 (3):38-52.
Gamm, Gerald. 1999. Urban Exodus: why the Jews left Boston and the Catholics stayed.
Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.


Convention
All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 39 of 40   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.