All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

"Creating Government Lies in Individuals": Zhang Shizhao and the Paradoxes of Founding
Unformatted Document Text:  11 actually constituting the people is set aside as a problem no longer relevant. Authority can then grounded in the promise of ongoing negotiation, secured either by the years of proto-democratic practices that preceded the official establishment of particular regimes (Wolin 1989; Connolly 1991; Arendt 1965), or in the promise of a dynamic constitution to evolve toward realization of those values the original founding could not initially satisfy (Olson 2007). Yet when no community yet exists to contest authority in a particular way, the paradoxes of founding do not disappear; they simply resound along a different register. Chinese reformers confronted these resounding paradoxes when they realized the difficulty of inculcating principles of self-rule—the very principles that make legitimacy accessible as a grounds for contestation— in a populace whose only political experience has been subjection under an absolute monarch, and whose political conceptualizations seem unable to render claims to self-rule intelligible. Upon what grounds can a self-ruling community take shape, if not through top-down impositions that would themselves inhibit the practices that constitute self-rule? Zhang‘s own interventions in these debates help to elaborate his own views regarding the paradoxes of elite rule in mass society, but he does not embrace the mass/elite dichotomy that marked so much of Chinese political thinking in the twentieth century. Instead, Zhang uses the language of Rousseau‘s social contract to re-think the capacities for political action on both sides. Confronting founding as a real and immanent event, Zhang is forced to truncate the circularity that for many contemporary political theorists assuages founding‘s paradoxes. In the process he is led to identify for individuals a more central role in both political founding and ongoing, regime- sustaining action. A Chinese Founding Narrative: The Social Contract

Authors: Jenco, Leigh.
first   previous   Page 12 of 46   next   last



background image
11
actually constituting the people is set aside as a problem no longer relevant. Authority can then
grounded in the promise of ongoing negotiation, secured either by the years of proto-democratic
practices that preceded the official establishment of particular regimes (Wolin 1989; Connolly
1991; Arendt 1965), or in the promise of a dynamic constitution to evolve toward realization of
those values the original founding could not initially satisfy (Olson 2007).
Yet when no community yet exists to contest authority in a particular way, the paradoxes
of founding do not disappear; they simply resound along a different register. Chinese reformers
confronted these resounding paradoxes when they realized the difficulty of inculcating principles
of self-rule—the very principles that make legitimacy accessible as a grounds for contestation—
in a populace whose only political experience has been subjection under an absolute monarch,
and whose political conceptualizations seem unable to render claims to self-rule intelligible.
Upon what grounds can a self-ruling community take shape, if not through top-down impositions
that would themselves inhibit the practices that constitute self-rule? Zhang‘s own interventions
in these debates help to elaborate his own views regarding the paradoxes of elite rule in mass
society, but he does not embrace the mass/elite dichotomy that marked so much of Chinese
political thinking in the twentieth century. Instead, Zhang uses the language of Rousseau‘s
social contract to re-think the capacities for political action on both sides. Confronting founding
as a real and immanent event, Zhang is forced to truncate the circularity that for many
contemporary political theorists assuages founding‘s paradoxes. In the process he is led to
identify for individuals a more central role in both political founding and ongoing, regime-
sustaining action.
A Chinese Founding Narrative: The Social Contract


Convention
Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 12 of 46   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.