All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Zealous Subjects: Active Participation in Early modern, Monarchical England
Unformatted Document Text:  In this paper, I demonstrate that Englishmen who employed the royalist discourse of honoring imposed stronger political obligations upon subjects when we compare these obligations with those emerging from the royalist doctrine of passive obedience. In contrast to the latter doctrine, the obligation to honor rulers obligated subjects externally and internally. Externally, it imposed obligations upon an honorer’s action, speech and gesture. Internally, it imposed obligations upon a subject’s will, emotional state, and his or her set of estimations and beliefs. Authors employing the discourse of honoring instructed subjects to obey their Christian rulers willingly, sincerely, diligently and promptly. The discourse of honoring obligated inferiors to love their Christian rulers and to fear them. It imposed upon them the obligation to conceive of them as truly superior. And, honoring had an imperialist element to it. For, not only did it command subjects to defend and vindicate their ruler’s honor. Honoring also commanded inferiors to magnify and to advance their ruler’s reputation throughout their lands, and beyond them. The obligation to honor rulers touched nearly every part of a subject’s being. In short, it was nearly a totalizing obligation. I argue that when we conceptualize mid-seventeenth century political obligation in terms of honoring, rather than in terms of passive obedience, we must envision a Christian subject who is morally obligated to be active, rather than passive; willing rather than indifferently; zealous in his or her obedience rather than grudging. 2 In contrast to the doctrine of passive obedience (which allows for passive resistance and passive obedience), the account of political obligation offered through the discourse of honoring 2 I do not mean to suggest here that Christian subjects were obligated to fervently obey rulers who broke God’s law. According to some Puritan accounts, they were not so obligated and their political obligation was significantly limited. This will be discussed in the paper. 4

Authors: Patterson-Tutschka, Monicka.
first   previous   Page 4 of 47   next   last



background image
In this paper, I demonstrate that Englishmen who employed the royalist discourse of
honoring imposed stronger political obligations upon subjects when we compare these
obligations with those emerging from the royalist doctrine of passive obedience. In
contrast to the latter doctrine, the obligation to honor rulers obligated subjects externally
and internally. Externally, it imposed obligations upon an honorer’s action, speech and
gesture. Internally, it imposed obligations upon a subject’s will, emotional state, and his
or her set of estimations and beliefs. Authors employing the discourse of honoring
instructed subjects to obey their Christian rulers willingly, sincerely, diligently and
promptly. The discourse of honoring obligated inferiors to love their Christian rulers and
to fear them. It imposed upon them the obligation to conceive of them as truly superior.
And, honoring had an imperialist element to it. For, not only did it command subjects to
defend and vindicate their ruler’s honor. Honoring also commanded inferiors to magnify
and to advance their ruler’s reputation throughout their lands, and beyond them. The
obligation to honor rulers touched nearly every part of a subject’s being. In short, it was
nearly a totalizing obligation.
I argue that when we conceptualize mid-seventeenth century political obligation in terms
of honoring, rather than in terms of passive obedience, we must envision a Christian
subject who is morally obligated to be active, rather than passive; willing rather than
indifferently; zealous in his or her obedience rather than grudging.
In contrast to the
doctrine of passive obedience (which allows for passive resistance and passive
obedience), the account of political obligation offered through the discourse of honoring
2
I do not mean to suggest here that Christian subjects were obligated to fervently obey rulers who broke
God’s law. According to some Puritan accounts, they were not so obligated and their political obligation
was significantly limited. This will be discussed in the paper.
4


Convention
All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 4 of 47   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.