All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

L.A.'s Top Cops: Racial and Ethnic Variation in Public Support for the Chief of Police
Unformatted Document Text:  Indicators” 2002, Benson 1981). Public approval of the police is far from universal, however. In particular, several studies have found African Americans more inclined than whites to believe that the police treat African Americans more harshly than other groups, to perceive that police racism and prejudice against African Americans is common, and to report that they have been treated unfairly by the police (Aberbach and Walker 1970, Benson 1981, Ennis 1967, Jacob 1970, Weitzer 2000, Weitzer et al. 2005, Wilson 1975). Group differences in perceptions of the police have significant implications for police-community relations. Sunshine and Tyler (2003) and Tyler and Huo (2002) argue that racial and ethnic group variation in perceptions of police legitimacy contribute to perceptions of police effectiveness, fairness of the distribution of police services, and police tactics, and charges of police brutality. Their findings are significant, not least because the police have more control over how they treat people than on the crime rate in their jurisdiction. They indicate that “over time, the police will be most effective in communities where they successfully engage social values such as legitimacy and accountability. It is these social values that lead to self-regulation on the part of most of the public, most of the time.” (Sunshine and Tyler 2003, 535) Through their influence over internal police department policies and practices, therefore, police chiefs have a potentially profound impact – either bolstering or undermining public perceptions of the police. Research concerning public opinion toward police departments’ top brass remains scarce, a surprising omission given the considerable latitude of police chiefs in shaping departmental policies and practices including officer hiring and promotion, policing styles and tactics, deployment patterns, and procedures for investigating citizen 9

Authors: Cohen Marks, Mara. and Stout, Chris.
first   previous   Page 9 of 41   next   last



background image
Indicators” 2002, Benson 1981). Public approval of the police is far from universal,
however. In particular, several studies have found African Americans more inclined than
whites to believe that the police treat African Americans more harshly than other groups,
to perceive that police racism and prejudice against African Americans is common, and
to report that they have been treated unfairly by the police (Aberbach and Walker 1970,
Benson 1981, Ennis 1967, Jacob 1970, Weitzer 2000, Weitzer et al. 2005, Wilson 1975).
Group differences in perceptions of the police have significant implications for
police-community relations. Sunshine and Tyler (2003) and Tyler and Huo (2002) argue
that racial and ethnic group variation in perceptions of police legitimacy contribute to
perceptions of police effectiveness, fairness of the distribution of police services, and
police tactics, and charges of police brutality. Their findings are significant, not least
because the police have more control over how they treat people than on the crime rate in
their jurisdiction. They indicate that “over time, the police will be most effective in
communities where they successfully engage social values such as legitimacy and
accountability. It is these social values that lead to self-regulation on the part of most of
the public, most of the time.” (Sunshine and Tyler 2003, 535) Through their influence
over internal police department policies and practices, therefore, police chiefs have a
potentially profound impact – either bolstering or undermining public perceptions of the
police.
Research concerning public opinion toward police departments’ top brass remains
scarce, a surprising omission given the considerable latitude of police chiefs in shaping
departmental policies and practices including officer hiring and promotion, policing
styles and tactics, deployment patterns, and procedures for investigating citizen
9


Convention
Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 9 of 41   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.