 |
A Dwarf amongst Giants? Understanding third party vote in contemporary French elections. The case of the FN.
| |
| | Unformatted Document Text:
24
home base. In 2007, it has become, in a sense, much more genuine “far right” party, but only because the traditional right has changed and there has been a constant decline of the PCF’s vote (Perrineau et al. 2007; Perrineau 2007d). The traditional right under Sarkozy moved into the home base of the FN by coopting many of the old Lepenist messages. To compound the irony yet further, the voters that the new French right has claimed from the FN would likely have been “closet leftists,” at least by their second round voting patterns.
In other words, at least a substantial part of the change in the patterns of French
elections consisted not of the traditional rightists shifting further to the right to capture the “far right” voters in general, but using the supposedly “far right” FN as a conduit to capture allegedly leftist voters in the second round.
One of the most interesting contributions of our paper is a methodological one.
Most of the analyses which exist on the electoral bases of the Front National rely exclusively on post-electoral survey data to make claims about the preferences of individuals (Mayer and Perrineau 1996; 1992; Evans 2000; Ivaldi 2005). Contrastingly, we use actual aggregate electoral data to analyse the direction of vote transfers from the first round into the second round. Our “cheap” technique has much room for improvement but we think it is indeed a small step in the right direction for analysing voter and party strategies in the current French institutional arrangement.
Future extensions of this paper would include the incorporation of the 2002 electoral
race as a further test of validity and, if available, more finely grained electoral data.
|
| | Authors: Hoyo, Veronica. and Kim, Henry. |
|
| |
|
|
24
home base. In 2007, it has become, in a sense, much more genuine “far right” party, but only because the traditional right has changed and there has been a constant decline of the PCF’s vote (Perrineau et al. 2007; Perrineau 2007d). The traditional right under Sarkozy moved into the home base of the FN by coopting many of the old Lepenist messages. To compound the irony yet further, the voters that the new French right has claimed from the FN would likely have been “closet leftists,” at least by their second round voting patterns.
In other words, at least a substantial part of the change in the patterns of French
elections consisted not of the traditional rightists shifting further to the right to capture the “far right” voters in general, but using the supposedly “far right” FN as a conduit to capture allegedly leftist voters in the second round.
One of the most interesting contributions of our paper is a methodological one.
Most of the analyses which exist on the electoral bases of the Front National rely exclusively on post-electoral survey data to make claims about the preferences of individuals (Mayer and Perrineau 1996; 1992; Evans 2000; Ivaldi 2005). Contrastingly, we use actual aggregate electoral data to analyse the direction of vote transfers from the first round into the second round. Our “cheap” technique has much room for improvement but we think it is indeed a small step in the right direction for analysing voter and party strategies in the current French institutional arrangement.
Future extensions of this paper would include the incorporation of the 2002 electoral
race as a further test of validity and, if available, more finely grained electoral data.
|
|
Convention | | All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs. | | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. | | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! | | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! | | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. | | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! | | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|