|
|
|
|
Codes, Culture, and Coercion: Explaining Adoption of Labor Self-regulation in the Global Apparel Industry |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
Since the 1990s, movements for improved labor standards in the global apparel industry pressured large, brand-name firms to adopt better protections for workers in outsourced production. By mapping adoption of such self-regulation, I show that this practice has become institutionalized in the industry. Self-regulation is no longer coerced through activist campaigns against brands; instead it is adopted by untargeted, unbranded challenger firms imitating the behavior of branded incumbents in search of legitimacy. In spite of evidence of institutionalization, self-regulation is not taken for granted by all firms in the industry. Firms adopt self-regulation when it fits with home country political cultures; firms from countries that lack strong labor legislation or activist groups do not self-regulate. Transnational connections to brands that require factories to respect workers rights do not supercede existing cultural frameworks and fail to produce lasting commitments. When thinking about isomorphic pressures in a global context, we thus have to take into account the unique national institutional frameworks within which events and practices are interpreted. Even in an organizational field characterized by extensive transnational production, consumption, and activist networks, coercive and mimetic pressures are underpinned by the historically constructed logics of national political cultures. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
firm (177), regul (136), self (130), adopt (118), self-regul (117), labor (89), brand (85), global (62), variabl (57), target (56), nation (54), worker (50), code (49), industri (48), compani (45), standard (45), polit (45), product (44), cultur (44), practic (40), apparel (39), |
|
|
 | Convention | | All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: American Sociological Association Annual Meeting URL: http://www.asanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Wetterberg, Anna. "Codes, Culture, and Coercion: Explaining Adoption of Labor Self-regulation in the Global Apparel Industry" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, Sheraton Boston and the Boston Marriott Copley Place, Boston, MA, Jul 31, 2008 <Not Available>. 2009-05-23 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p239832_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Wetterberg, A. M. , 2008-07-31 "Codes, Culture, and Coercion: Explaining Adoption of Labor Self-regulation in the Global Apparel Industry" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, Sheraton Boston and the Boston Marriott Copley Place, Boston, MA Online <PDF>. 2009-05-23 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p239832_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Abstract: Since the 1990s, movements for improved labor standards in the global apparel industry pressured large, brand-name firms to adopt better protections for workers in outsourced production. By mapping adoption of such self-regulation, I show that this practice has become institutionalized in the industry. Self-regulation is no longer coerced through activist campaigns against brands; instead it is adopted by untargeted, unbranded challenger firms imitating the behavior of branded incumbents in search of legitimacy. In spite of evidence of institutionalization, self-regulation is not taken for granted by all firms in the industry. Firms adopt self-regulation when it fits with home country political cultures; firms from countries that lack strong labor legislation or activist groups do not self-regulate. Transnational connections to brands that require factories to respect workers rights do not supercede existing cultural frameworks and fail to produce lasting commitments. When thinking about isomorphic pressures in a global context, we thus have to take into account the unique national institutional frameworks within which events and practices are interpreted. Even in an organizational field characterized by extensive transnational production, consumption, and activist networks, coercive and mimetic pressures are underpinned by the historically constructed logics of national political cultures. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
PDF |
| Page count: |
25 |
| Word count: |
10729 |
| Text sample: |
| Connections Culture and Coercion: The Institutionalization of Labor Self-regulation in the Global Apparel Industry Anna Wetterberg University of California Berkeley I. INTRODUCTION In March 1992 Levi Strauss & Co. announced its Global Sourcing Guidelines which was the first attempt at voluntary labor standards by an apparel firm. Levi Strauss had long been perceived as a company with a strong progressive tradition refusing to lay off workers during the Great Depression integrating factories in the American South in the 1960s |
| Romania Lithuania Russia Turkey 0 0 2 4 6 8 # of core ILO conventions ratified 1/14/08 asa08_proceeding_239832.doc 25 |
Similar Titles:
Concept vs. Content: The Institutionalization of Labor Self-Regulation in the Global Apparel Industry
Catching Codes: The Institutionalization of Self-Regulation in the Global Apparel Industry
Globalization, State Politics and Cultural Identity in Bangladesh: The Role of National Cinema in a Postcolonial Nation-space
|
|