All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

"Fixed" Sentencing Reforms: The Effect on the Racial Composition of Imprisonment Rates Over Time
Unformatted Document Text:            Leymon 12    Both Hypothesis 4 and Hypothesis 5 also find considerable support in the racial threat literature.  The  theory suggests that minorities are perceived as a “threat” to the majority population (Jacobs and O’Brien,  1998; Parker, Stults, and Rice, 2005).  Research has shown that African Americans are seen (overtly or  contextually) as “criminals”, particularly as “violent criminals” and as more African Americans enter a  community, the perception of physical and social threat increases (Blumer, 1958; Kent and Jacobs, 2005).   This perceived threat translates into more arrests, charges, convictions, and longer sentences for  minorities and this will translate into higher imprisonment rates (Jacobs and Carmichael, 2001; Parker,  Stults, and Rice, 2005).  The perceived threat does not need to be related to a real threat, and thus  minorities may be imprisoned at higher rates simply because they make up a larger portion of the  population (Quillian, 1995).  The perceived “threat” can take the form of either a threat of higher criminal  activity and thus minorities will be targeted as “the criminals” or a threat to social, political and/or  economic dominance and again minorities could be targeted by the criminal justice system as a form of  social and economic control (Kent and Jacobs, 2005).  DATA AND METHODS  MEASUREMENTS  This study utilizes state level data covering each year between 1978 and 1998 with data available for  all 50 states.  This allows for assessment of the impacts of sentencing changes on imprisonment rates over  time.  While data on total imprisonment is available beyond 1998 on a state level, state level data for  independent racial groups is not available beyond 1998.  Furthermore, data for whites and African  Americans imprisonment is not available prior to 1978 and is not available prior to 1981 for Hispanics.   Washington DC is often included in analysis of this type (treated as a “fifty-first state”), but was excluded  as data because the entire time period in question was not complete for this data. 2   Furthermore, in the  analysis of the aggregated racial/ethnic groups Vermont was excluded from the analysis, as the state did  not report racial composition of their prisons in most of the years under investigation.  Data for the five  dependent variables, African-American prison populations per 1000 African-American, white prison                                                    2  Along with incomplete data, Washington DC stopped housing its own prisoners in 2001. 

Authors: Harmon, Mark.
first   previous   Page 12 of 29   next   last



background image
 
 
 
 
 
Leymon 12 
 
Both Hypothesis 4 and Hypothesis 5 also find considerable support in the racial threat literature.  The 
theory suggests that minorities are perceived as a “threat” to the majority population (Jacobs and O’Brien, 
1998; Parker, Stults, and Rice, 2005).  Research has shown that African Americans are seen (overtly or 
contextually) as “criminals”, particularly as “violent criminals” and as more African Americans enter a 
community, the perception of physical and social threat increases (Blumer, 1958; Kent and Jacobs, 2005).  
This perceived threat translates into more arrests, charges, convictions, and longer sentences for 
minorities and this will translate into higher imprisonment rates (Jacobs and Carmichael, 2001; Parker, 
Stults, and Rice, 2005).  The perceived threat does not need to be related to a real threat, and thus 
minorities may be imprisoned at higher rates simply because they make up a larger portion of the 
population (Quillian, 1995).  The perceived “threat” can take the form of either a threat of higher criminal 
activity and thus minorities will be targeted as “the criminals” or a threat to social, political and/or 
economic dominance and again minorities could be targeted by the criminal justice system as a form of 
social and economic control (Kent and Jacobs, 2005). 
DATA AND METHODS 
MEASUREMENTS 
This study utilizes state level data covering each year between 1978 and 1998 with data available for 
all 50 states.  This allows for assessment of the impacts of sentencing changes on imprisonment rates over 
time.  While data on total imprisonment is available beyond 1998 on a state level, state level data for 
independent racial groups is not available beyond 1998.  Furthermore, data for whites and African 
Americans imprisonment is not available prior to 1978 and is not available prior to 1981 for Hispanics.  
Washington DC is often included in analysis of this type (treated as a “fifty-first state”), but was excluded 
as data because the entire time period in question was not complete for this data.
2
  Furthermore, in the 
analysis of the aggregated racial/ethnic groups Vermont was excluded from the analysis, as the state did 
not report racial composition of their prisons in most of the years under investigation.  Data for the five 
dependent variables, African-American prison populations per 1000 African-American, white prison 
                                                 
2
 Along with incomplete data, Washington DC stopped housing its own prisoners in 2001. 


Convention
Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 12 of 29   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.