All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

"Fixed" Sentencing Reforms: The Effect on the Racial Composition of Imprisonment Rates Over Time
Unformatted Document Text:            Leymon 20    are incarcerated at higher rates 20 ; if therefore, voluntary guidelines resulted in a 10 percent increase in  imprisonment rates for each racial group, the increase in the African American rates would be greater  than for the white rates and the coefficient associated with voluntary guidelines in the African American  equation would be greater than for the coefficient in the analysis of the white imprisonment rates.    ANALYSIS OF THE RACIAL DISPARITY IN IMPRISONMENT RATES     Based on previous research, it was hypothesized (Hypothesis 4) that sentencing guidelines,  presumptive sentencing, and determinate would have a greater effect on black imprisonment rates than on  white imprisonment rates, increasing imprisonment more for African Americans than whites (Engen,  Gainey, Crutchfield, and Weis, 2003; Arvantis and Asher, 1998; Gorton and Boies, 1999).  It was also  hypothesized that the effects of guidelines on the Hispanic imprisonment rates would be greater than on  the white incarceration rates (Hypothesis 5).  To facilitate the testing of Hypothesis 4 and Hypothesis 5, a  ratio of the black imprisonment rate to the white imprisonment rate and a ratio of Hispanic imprisonment  rate to the white imprisonment rate were constructed.  These variables were regressed on the logarithmic  growth curves of the “fixed” sentencing reforms, as well as percent African American, and percent  Hispanic in models 1 and 2 and the full models in for each dependent variable in models 3 and 4 (not  displayed or discussed).  Again, it should be noted that these additional controls are not disaggregated by  race.  The results for both types of sentencing guidelines were consistent in analyses that included these  additional controls and analyses that did not.    The results revealed that both guideline types were a significant predictor, increasing the ratio of  black to white imprisonment and Hispanic to white imprisonment (see Table 2).  The results support  Hypothesis 4 and 5 that both presumptive and voluntary sentencing guidelines have a greater effect on the  black and Hispanic imprisonment rates than the white rates.  While both presumptive sentencing and  determinate sentencing were not significant for the ratio of black imprisonment to white imprisonment,  presumptive sentencing was significant for the ratio of Hispanic to white imprisonment while again  determinate sentencing was not significant.  These findings are striking, indicating that sentencing                                                    20  The mean incarceration rate for African Americans over the period of study is 8.66 per 1000; the average Hispanic rate  is 2.44 per 1000, while the white mean rate is 1.43.    

Authors: Harmon, Mark.
first   previous   Page 20 of 29   next   last



background image
 
 
 
 
 
Leymon 20 
 
are incarcerated at higher rates
20
; if therefore, voluntary guidelines resulted in a 10 percent increase in 
imprisonment rates for each racial group, the increase in the African American rates would be greater 
than for the white rates and the coefficient associated with voluntary guidelines in the African American 
equation would be greater than for the coefficient in the analysis of the white imprisonment rates.   
ANALYSIS OF THE RACIAL DISPARITY IN IMPRISONMENT RATES    
Based on previous research, it was hypothesized (Hypothesis 4) that sentencing guidelines, 
presumptive sentencing, and determinate would have a greater effect on black imprisonment rates than on 
white imprisonment rates, increasing imprisonment more for African Americans than whites (Engen, 
Gainey, Crutchfield, and Weis, 2003; Arvantis and Asher, 1998; Gorton and Boies, 1999).  It was also 
hypothesized that the effects of guidelines on the Hispanic imprisonment rates would be greater than on 
the white incarceration rates (Hypothesis 5).  To facilitate the testing of Hypothesis 4 and Hypothesis 5, a 
ratio of the black imprisonment rate to the white imprisonment rate and a ratio of Hispanic imprisonment 
rate to the white imprisonment rate were constructed.  These variables were regressed on the logarithmic 
growth curves of the “fixed” sentencing reforms, as well as percent African American, and percent 
Hispanic in models 1 and 2 and the full models in for each dependent variable in models 3 and 4 (not 
displayed or discussed).  Again, it should be noted that these additional controls are not disaggregated by 
race.  The results for both types of sentencing guidelines were consistent in analyses that included these 
additional controls and analyses that did not.   
The results revealed that both guideline types were a significant predictor, increasing the ratio of 
black to white imprisonment and Hispanic to white imprisonment (see Table 2).  The results support 
Hypothesis 4 and 5 that both presumptive and voluntary sentencing guidelines have a greater effect on the 
black and Hispanic imprisonment rates than the white rates.  While both presumptive sentencing and 
determinate sentencing were not significant for the ratio of black imprisonment to white imprisonment, 
presumptive sentencing was significant for the ratio of Hispanic to white imprisonment while again 
determinate sentencing was not significant.  These findings are striking, indicating that sentencing 
                                                 
20
 The mean incarceration rate for African Americans over the period of study is 8.66 per 1000; the average Hispanic rate 
is 2.44 per 1000, while the white mean rate is 1.43.    


Convention
All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 20 of 29   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.