|
|
|
|
The urban political ecology of networked infrastructures: What can we learn from technology studies and urban studies? |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
Networked urban infrastructures like energy, water, wastewater, and transport systems are "material mediators between nature and the city" (Kaika and Swyngedouw 2000). They can be regarded as both, a vital root cause of many environmental problems, while also offering important keys for reducing the ecological footprint of cities. These socio-technical systems are co-evolving in a dialectic relationship with cities: On the one hand the development of the modern city was made possible only by urban infrastructures that guide and facilitate urban functioning and urban life in a multitude of ways. On the other hand the urban environment was a precondition for the development of these "urban ma-chines" and still today cities are the loci and foci of socio-technological and socio-environmental innovations that sustain the development of networks. The co-evolution between cities and technical infrastructures and the ways in which we develop, govern and renew our infrastructures in cities are thus key matters of urban political ecology and societal relationships with nature.
The objective of this paper is to scrutinize, how different literatures in both, urban studies and technology studies reflect this interrelationship and the urban conditions of sustain-ability transitions (historical studies of technology, social studies of technology, urban political ecology, studies of urban utility restructuring). It is hypothesized that none of the concepts discussed in these literatures is entirely appropriate for understanding the am-bivalent socio-ecological role of urban infrastructures, for explaining the complex interre-lation between cities, urban technologies and natural environments and for conceptualiz-ing how socio-technical innovations can be achieved in cities. However, integrating the most valuable elements of these literatures could considerably advance the study of urban infrastructures and of their transition to sustainability. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
urban (255), technolog (154), studi (151), infrastructur (137), citi (132), govern (88), technic (82), ecolog (79), system (74), socio (72), social (70), polit (64), innov (63), process (54), network (54), natur (51), develop (51), environment (50), page (44), chang (42), sustain (37), |
Author's Keywords:
|
urban politicl ecology; urban infrastructures; urban technologies; technology and environment; |
|
 | Convention | | Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events! |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: American Sociological Association Annual Meeting URL: http://www.asanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Monstadt, Jochen. "The urban political ecology of networked infrastructures: What can we learn from technology studies and urban studies?" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, Sheraton Boston and the Boston Marriott Copley Place, Boston, MA, Jul 31, 2008 <Not Available>. 2009-05-23 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p242915_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Monstadt, J. , 2008-07-31 "The urban political ecology of networked infrastructures: What can we learn from technology studies and urban studies?" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, Sheraton Boston and the Boston Marriott Copley Place, Boston, MA Online <PDF>. 2009-05-23 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p242915_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Abstract: Networked urban infrastructures like energy, water, wastewater, and transport systems are "material mediators between nature and the city" (Kaika and Swyngedouw 2000). They can be regarded as both, a vital root cause of many environmental problems, while also offering important keys for reducing the ecological footprint of cities. These socio-technical systems are co-evolving in a dialectic relationship with cities: On the one hand the development of the modern city was made possible only by urban infrastructures that guide and facilitate urban functioning and urban life in a multitude of ways. On the other hand the urban environment was a precondition for the development of these "urban ma-chines" and still today cities are the loci and foci of socio-technological and socio-environmental innovations that sustain the development of networks. The co-evolution between cities and technical infrastructures and the ways in which we develop, govern and renew our infrastructures in cities are thus key matters of urban political ecology and societal relationships with nature.
The objective of this paper is to scrutinize, how different literatures in both, urban studies and technology studies reflect this interrelationship and the urban conditions of sustain-ability transitions (historical studies of technology, social studies of technology, urban political ecology, studies of urban utility restructuring). It is hypothesized that none of the concepts discussed in these literatures is entirely appropriate for understanding the am-bivalent socio-ecological role of urban infrastructures, for explaining the complex interre-lation between cities, urban technologies and natural environments and for conceptualiz-ing how socio-technical innovations can be achieved in cities. However, integrating the most valuable elements of these literatures could considerably advance the study of urban infrastructures and of their transition to sustainability. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
PDF |
| Page count: |
25 |
| Word count: |
11028 |
| Text sample: |
| 1 Reconsidering the urban political ecology of networked infrastructures: What can we learn from technology and urban studies? Jochen Monstadt City Institute at York University (monstadt@yorku.ca) 1. Urban sustainability and networked infrastructures – An introduction The relationship between networked infrastructure systems and the environment has been a critical issue for environmental policy for several decades. From an environmental perspective networked infrastructures like energy water wastewater and transport systems are inherently ambivalent: they can be seen as both a vital |
| H-W Sinn J Whalley (MIT Press Cambridge MA) pp 3-51 Voß J-P Bauknecht D Kemp R (eds) 2006 Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development (Edward Elgar Publishing Cheltenham) Wheeler S M 2004 Planning for Sustainability: Creating Livable Equitable and Ecological Communities (Routledge London) Wittig R Sukopp H 1998 "Was ist Stadtökologie?" in Stadtökologie Eds H Sukopp R Wittig (G. Fischer Stuttgart Jena New York) pp 1-12 17.01.2008 25 Young D Keil R 2005 "Urinetown or Morainetown? Debates on the reregulation |
Similar Titles:
Transnational Advocacy Networks and Political Change in Mexico: Towards a Process of Socialization of International Norms of Violence against Women in the Case of Murdered Women in Ciudad Juarez, Chihuahua
Cities and Natural Resources in an Urban World: The Political Development of Water Privatization in the United States
Cities and Natural Resources in an Urban World: The Political Development of Water Privatization in the United States
|
|