Convention All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting. Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! Click here for more information.
Association: Name: ISA's 49th ANNUAL CONVENTION, BRIDGING MULTIPLE DIVIDES URL: http://www.isanet.org
Citation: URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p250762_index.html Direct Link: HTML Code:

Staton, Jeffrey. "Judicial Politics, Meet International Human Rights Law; International Humans Rights Law, Meet Judicial Politics: A Call for Dialogue" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the ISA's 49th ANNUAL CONVENTION, BRIDGING MULTIPLE DIVIDES, Hilton San Francisco, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, USA, Mar 26, 2008 <Not Available>. 2009-05-23 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p250762_index.html>

Staton, J. K. , 2008-03-26 "Judicial Politics, Meet International Human Rights Law; International Humans Rights Law, Meet Judicial Politics: A Call for Dialogue" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the ISA's 49th ANNUAL CONVENTION, BRIDGING MULTIPLE DIVIDES, Hilton San Francisco, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, USA Online <APPLICATION/PDF>. 2009-05-23 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p250762_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Abstract: The literatures on judicial politics and international human rightslaw are wresting with nearly identical theoretical puzzles yet theyproceed seemingly unaware of the insights of the other. In this paperwe consider how scholars might more efficiently advance their researchagendas by developing greater familiarity with work outside of theircore subfield. In particular, we focus on two theoretical problems:1. Why would an executive delegate to a third party the power topunish its behavior?2. Once an executive so delegates, how can we account for the thirdparty's development of independent political influence?Scholars writing in both literatures tend to focus on only one ofthese questions, yet they are inextricably linked. We argue that asatisfactory answer to the first question depends on the answer to thesecond. Our paper substantiates this assertion and then developsimplications for a research agenda to make progress in both areas ofinquiry.

The Politics of International Judicial Appointments: Evidence from the European Court of Human Rights

Challenging the Global Governance of Human Rights: The United States and the International Criminal Court

Political Communication among Advocacy Group, Government and International Institute: Campaign of Human Rights Nongovernmental Organization on �Comfort Women� Issue in East Asia