|
|
|
|
Discursive Power and ‘Global’ Politics: Global Civil Society and the Construction of our ‘Global’ World |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
|
Abstract:
|
Recent years have seen a striking proliferation of the term ‘global’ in public, political and political studies discourse world-wide. ‘Global’ has come to constitute a significant political currency; it has come to be one of the discourse-shaping terms today. Yet, reflection on the diverse applications of the term ‘global’ and the ideas that are associated with it has been rare. ‘Global’ is naturalised, meaning that it is taken for granted. The ‘naturalisation’ of the term ‘global’ is problematic, though, because the idea of ‘global’ potentially challenges traditional perceptions of socio-political reality and addresses the important social coordinates of ‘we’ and ‘them’; at the same time it (potentially) blurs power relations and particular interests in that it covers them in (supposedly) all-embracing, ‘global’ terms. Based on a post-structuralist understanding of the relation between reality, linguistic signs and meanings this paper advocates a critical attitude towards the world-wide powerful political currency ‘global’. Which ideas are associated with ‘global’ and by whom are they promoted? Given that prominent (Northern) civil society groups, such as Greenpeace, Amnesty International, Oxfam, WWF, serve as ‘signifying agents’ and have come to gain significant discursive power in the contemporary ‘global’ political discourse, this paper applies a computer assisted content analysis to the communication output of these groups in order to investigate and to reveal how they use the term ‘global’ and in which way they contribute to the discursive construction of (the coordinates of) our contemporary ‘global’ world. |
|
 | Convention | | Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events! |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: ISA's 49th ANNUAL CONVENTION, BRIDGING MULTIPLE DIVIDES URL: http://www.isanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Selchow, Sabine. "Discursive Power and ‘Global’ Politics: Global Civil Society and the Construction of our ‘Global’ World" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the ISA's 49th ANNUAL CONVENTION, BRIDGING MULTIPLE DIVIDES, Hilton San Francisco, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, USA, Mar 26, 2008 <Not Available>. 2009-05-23 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p251944_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Selchow, S. , 2008-03-26 "Discursive Power and ‘Global’ Politics: Global Civil Society and the Construction of our ‘Global’ World" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the ISA's 49th ANNUAL CONVENTION, BRIDGING MULTIPLE DIVIDES, Hilton San Francisco, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, USA <Not Available>. 2009-05-23 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p251944_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Abstract: Recent years have seen a striking proliferation of the term ‘global’ in public, political and political studies discourse world-wide. ‘Global’ has come to constitute a significant political currency; it has come to be one of the discourse-shaping terms today. Yet, reflection on the diverse applications of the term ‘global’ and the ideas that are associated with it has been rare. ‘Global’ is naturalised, meaning that it is taken for granted. The ‘naturalisation’ of the term ‘global’ is problematic, though, because the idea of ‘global’ potentially challenges traditional perceptions of socio-political reality and addresses the important social coordinates of ‘we’ and ‘them’; at the same time it (potentially) blurs power relations and particular interests in that it covers them in (supposedly) all-embracing, ‘global’ terms. Based on a post-structuralist understanding of the relation between reality, linguistic signs and meanings this paper advocates a critical attitude towards the world-wide powerful political currency ‘global’. Which ideas are associated with ‘global’ and by whom are they promoted? Given that prominent (Northern) civil society groups, such as Greenpeace, Amnesty International, Oxfam, WWF, serve as ‘signifying agents’ and have come to gain significant discursive power in the contemporary ‘global’ political discourse, this paper applies a computer assisted content analysis to the communication output of these groups in order to investigate and to reveal how they use the term ‘global’ and in which way they contribute to the discursive construction of (the coordinates of) our contemporary ‘global’ world. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
Similar Titles:
Practice Makes Perfect? An Empirical Study of District Court Judges Experience with Patent Cases
A Case-Study of Trends for Courts and Judges:Information Added by Amici in Goodridge
Case Volume Effects on Courtroom Decision Making: Trial Court Conviction and Prison Rates
|
|