Convention All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting. Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! Click here for more information.
Association: Name: ISA's 49th ANNUAL CONVENTION, BRIDGING MULTIPLE DIVIDES URL: http://www.isanet.org
Citation: URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p253216_index.html Direct Link: HTML Code:

McCormick, James. "American Foreign Policy after the Bush Administration: Insights from the Public" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the ISA's 49th ANNUAL CONVENTION, BRIDGING MULTIPLE DIVIDES, Hilton San Francisco, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, USA, Mar 26, 2008 <Not Available>. 2010-03-12 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p253216_index.html>

McCormick, J. M. , 2008-03-26 "American Foreign Policy after the Bush Administration: Insights from the Public" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the ISA's 49th ANNUAL CONVENTION, BRIDGING MULTIPLE DIVIDES, Hilton San Francisco, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, USA Online <PDF>. 2010-03-12 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p253216_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Abstract: In this paper, I adopt the perspective of a structured and stable public view to analyze the possible linkage between public opinion and U.S. foreign policy, as we move to a post-Bush administration. The analysis proceeds in the following way. First, the paper begins by reviewing these competing theoretical perspectives, based upon recent studies of the public opinion—foreign policy linkage, and assessing their relative utility today. Second, utilizing the second perspective, the research identifies several necessary and sufficient conditions required for the public to have an effect on foreign policy. The necessary conditions are the degree of structure and stability in the public’s views, and the sufficient conditions are the leaders’ receptivity to the public’s views on foreign policy and the degree of public access to the decision-making process. Third, using some recent polling data, I summarize the public’s current general orientation to foreign policy and its position on key issues. Fourth, I assess the foreign policy positions of the likely 2008 Democratic and Republican nominees, their receptivity (and compatibility) with the public’s view, and the likelihood that their decision styles will facilitate public input. Finally, the analysis concludes by identifying several structural and process factors that will arguably facilitate greater public impact on foreign policy, regardless of the candidate ultimately chosen as the next president.

The Arrival of the ???Other??? and General and Specific Policy Support Among Whites: The Impact of Immigration on Public Opinion

Public Opinion in Authoritarian States: Exploring the Impact of Growing Anti-Japanese Sentiment on Chinese Foreign Policy Decision-Making

The Diversionary Theory of Foreign Policy?: American Presidents and Public Opinion.