Convention All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting. Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! Click here for more information.
Association: Name: ISA's 49th ANNUAL CONVENTION, BRIDGING MULTIPLE DIVIDES URL: http://www.isanet.org
Citation: URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p254224_index.html Direct Link: HTML Code:

Choi, Ji Young. "Power, Identity, and Asian Regionalism: Political Rivalry between China and Japan and A Contested Regional Identity in East Asia" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the ISA's 49th ANNUAL CONVENTION, BRIDGING MULTIPLE DIVIDES, Hilton San Francisco, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, USA, Mar 26, 2008 <Not Available>. 2009-05-23 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p254224_index.html>

Choi, J. , 2008-03-26 "Power, Identity, and Asian Regionalism: Political Rivalry between China and Japan and A Contested Regional Identity in East Asia" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the ISA's 49th ANNUAL CONVENTION, BRIDGING MULTIPLE DIVIDES, Hilton San Francisco, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, USA Online <PDF>. 2009-05-23 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p254224_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Abstract: This paper examines the contested process of Asian regionalism with a specific focus on the question of why East Asia has not succeeded in establishing a formally institutionalized regional scheme. To answer this question, I seek to establish a 'bridge-building enterprise' between realism and constructivism. Unlike other regions, increasing economic interdependence has not developed into formal regional institutionalization in East Asia because political factors including power relations (for example, hegemonic competition between China and Japan, the unresolved historical legacy of Japan, and the region's economic and political dependence on the US) have prevailed over economic logic in the region. Although Asia-only regionalism has emerged since the Asian Financial Crisis in the late 1990s in the form of ASEAN + 3 or the East Asian Summit, the progress of it has been very slow in part because major powers in the region have not been able to agree to the boundary of the region or the membership of a new regional initiative. In other words, political struggles in the region have developed into identity struggles.

Japan and the Consolidation of East Asian Regionalism: The ASEAN-Japan Closer Economic Partnership Agreement

China, Japan, and ASEAN in East Asian Regionalism: Diverse Approaches to Regional Integration