Citation

Feminist Analysis at the Intersection of Critical Security Studies and Peace Studies

Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles




STOP!

You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below.

View Document as HTML:
Click here to view the document

Abstract:

The end of the Cold War, globalisation and 9/11 signify high points in the move towards greater convergence between security studies and peace studies. This cross-fertilisation is viewed as positive, since it has increased the range of voices participating in the inter-disciplinary dialogue. The paper examines the risks and benefits associated with the role feminist scholarship plays in this regard. It not only offers an alternative vision of security and power through the lens of gender, but also presents a view of global security as being representative of a whole range of experiences, including those of women. For instance, in the human security discourse a feminist analysis exposes the dangers of co-option and perceived gender neutrality. The paper thus challenges the notion that a comprehensive unified theory of security should be the ultimate goal and argues that feminist methodologies can promote responsible theory pluralism and theoretical progress in IR by making the various security discourses more reflective of their own normative assumptions and political commitments.

Most Common Document Word Stems:

secur (255), human (108), gender (102), peac (94), studi (79), feminist (71), critic (66), women (57), theori (47), polit (41), intern (40), 2006 (38), state (38), approach (38), conflict (37), develop (34), also (34), new (29), relat (27), world (26), research (25),

Author's Keywords:

gender, feminist analysis, critical security, peace, human security
Convention
Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

Association:
Name: ISA's 49th ANNUAL CONVENTION, BRIDGING MULTIPLE DIVIDES
URL:
http://www.isanet.org


Citation:
URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p254365_index.html
Direct Link:
HTML Code:

MLA Citation:

Hudson, Heidi. "Feminist Analysis at the Intersection of Critical Security Studies and Peace Studies" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the ISA's 49th ANNUAL CONVENTION, BRIDGING MULTIPLE DIVIDES, Hilton San Francisco, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, USA, Mar 26, 2008 <Not Available>. 2009-05-23 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p254365_index.html>

APA Citation:

Hudson, H. , 2008-03-26 "Feminist Analysis at the Intersection of Critical Security Studies and Peace Studies" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the ISA's 49th ANNUAL CONVENTION, BRIDGING MULTIPLE DIVIDES, Hilton San Francisco, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, USA Online <PDF>. 2009-05-23 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p254365_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Abstract: The end of the Cold War, globalisation and 9/11 signify high points in the move towards greater convergence between security studies and peace studies. This cross-fertilisation is viewed as positive, since it has increased the range of voices participating in the inter-disciplinary dialogue. The paper examines the risks and benefits associated with the role feminist scholarship plays in this regard. It not only offers an alternative vision of security and power through the lens of gender, but also presents a view of global security as being representative of a whole range of experiences, including those of women. For instance, in the human security discourse a feminist analysis exposes the dangers of co-option and perceived gender neutrality. The paper thus challenges the notion that a comprehensive unified theory of security should be the ultimate goal and argues that feminist methodologies can promote responsible theory pluralism and theoretical progress in IR by making the various security discourses more reflective of their own normative assumptions and political commitments.

Get this Document:

Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.

Abstract Only All Academic Inc.
Abstract Only ISA's 49th ANNUAL CONVENTION, BRIDGING MULTIPLE DIVIDES
Abstract Only Political Research Online

Document Type: PDF
Page count: 21
Word count: 9947
Text sample:
FEMINIST ANALYSIS AT THE INTERSECTION OF CRITICAL SECURITY STUDIES AND PEACE STUDIES Heidi Hudson Department of Political Science University of the Free State PO Box 339 BLOEMFONTEIN 9300 South Africa +27 (0)51 401 2327 hudsonh.hum@ufs.ac.za DRAFT 1. INTRODUCTION Intellectual shifts in the disciplines of International Relations (IR) and security studies did not come about as a result of scholars’ rigorous engagement with theory. The dramatic changes were mainly the result of broader historical forces which made the existing order
. Van Munster R. 2007. Security on a Shoestring: A Hitchhiker’s Guide to Critical Schools of Security in Europe. Cooperation and Conflict 42(2):235-243. Väyrynen T. 2004. Gender and UN Peace Operations: The Confines of Modernity. International Peacekeeping 11(1):125-142. Wallensteen P. 2006. Understanding Conflict Resolution. London: Sage. Waylen G. 2006. You still don’t understand: why troubled engagements continue between feminists and (critical) IPE. Review of International Studies 32:145-164. Wirtz J.J. 2007. A New Agenda for Security and Strategy? In: Baylis


Similar Titles:
Why do states choose certain normative strategies over others in world politics? Interrogating theories of normative state agency in International Relations.

The Critical History of Security: From Peace Research to Feminist Security Studies

Gendered Peace: Feminist Critical Methodology in the Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom’s Disarmament Policies


 
All Academic, Inc. is your premier source for research and conference management. Visit our website, www.allacademic.com, to see how we can help you today.