|
|
|
|
Picking and Choosing Revisited |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
Human behavior, like everything else, has causes. Most of the time, those causes can be described as reasons. Human beings perform actions because they have reasons for performing them. They are capable of surveying the options available and then selecting the one with the best reasons recommending it. But invariably occasions arise in which the reasons for acting are equally good for two or more options. On such an occasion, the agent is indifferent between these options. Selection from within this set cannot then be based on reasons. Instead, the agent must fall back upon a causal process unrelated to reasons. The agent “picks,” but does not “choose.” This paper investigates the phenomenon of picking, situating it within a broader account of rational decision-making. It specifies the circumstances under which the phenomenon (justifiably) arises. It distinguishes between picking and a variety of closely related phenomena, such as selection based upon brute desire, acting upon “hunches,” and selection via formal lottery such as a coin toss. It concludes that picking requires people to resort to a special class of reasons in order to justify their behavior. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
pick (177), reason (167), one (107), option (105), agent (100), decis (75), make (68), select (67), may (66), situat (61), filter (51), might (47), case (44), ration (39), choos (38), process (38), indeterminaci (37), would (37), set (36), two (36), differ (35), |
|
|
 | Convention | | All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: MPSA Annual National Conference URL: http://www.indiana.edu/~mpsa/
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Stone, Peter. "Picking and Choosing Revisited" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the MPSA Annual National Conference, Palmer House Hotel, Hilton, Chicago, IL, Apr 03, 2008 <Not Available>. 2010-01-23 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p265771_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Stone, P. , 2008-04-03 "Picking and Choosing Revisited" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the MPSA Annual National Conference, Palmer House Hotel, Hilton, Chicago, IL Online <APPLICATION/PDF>. 2010-01-23 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p265771_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Abstract: Human behavior, like everything else, has causes. Most of the time, those causes can be described as reasons. Human beings perform actions because they have reasons for performing them. They are capable of surveying the options available and then selecting the one with the best reasons recommending it. But invariably occasions arise in which the reasons for acting are equally good for two or more options. On such an occasion, the agent is indifferent between these options. Selection from within this set cannot then be based on reasons. Instead, the agent must fall back upon a causal process unrelated to reasons. The agent “picks,” but does not “choose.” This paper investigates the phenomenon of picking, situating it within a broader account of rational decision-making. It specifies the circumstances under which the phenomenon (justifiably) arises. It distinguishes between picking and a variety of closely related phenomena, such as selection based upon brute desire, acting upon “hunches,” and selection via formal lottery such as a coin toss. It concludes that picking requires people to resort to a special class of reasons in order to justify their behavior. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
application/pdf |
| Page count: |
38 |
| Word count: |
10216 |
| Text sample: |
| Picking and Choosing Revisited Peter Stone Political Science Department Stanford University Stanford CA 94305-6044 650-725-2916 peter.stone@stanford.edu Abstract: Human behavior like everything else has causes. Most of the time those causes can be described as reasons. Human beings perform actions because they have reasons for performing them. They are capable of surveying the options available and then selecting the one with the best reasons recommending it. But invariably occasions arise in which the reasons for acting are equally good for |
| difference should guarantee the existence of a difference relevant to a given decision-making context. Nor did he explain why such differences should always be perceptible; he simply took it as a matter of faith. See Rescher (1959-1960 pp. 142-143). 20 UMM’s account seems to imply that a being with access to reasons but no non-reasoned causal processes would if confronted by genuine indeterminacy suffer the fate of Buridan’s Ass. This is the conclusion reached by Ronald de Sousa although |
Similar Titles:
Situational Factors and Decision-Making in the Offending Process: Comparing Rapists, Child Molesters, and Victim-Crossover Sex Offenders
Evaluating the Effects of Juvenile Competency to Stand Trial--Decisions across Two Different States: How Does Law Advance Case Processing Options in Juvenile Court?
Differences in Decision-Making Process Between Clients and Lawyers: The Cases of Multiple Debts in Japan
Case Processing Decision-Making in the New York State Family Court: An Investigation of the courtroom workgroup relationships on case processing decisions
|
|