|
|
|
|
The Determinants of Strategic Voting in the 2002 and 2006 Presidential Elections in Brazil |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP!
You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
Taking advantage of panel survey data, I pursue two goals in this paper. First I present an assessment of the amount of strategic voting found in the last two presidential elections in Brazil. Second, I develop an analysis of its causes. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
vote (163), lula (142), strateg (130), serra (111), prefer (84), voter (73), elect (67), second (61), ciro (58), candid (56), garotinho (52), first (51), polit (50), parti (49), variabl (41), thermomet (39), tabl (35), vs (33), tie (30), probabl (30), model (30), |
|
 | Convention | | Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: MPSA Annual National Conference
URL: http://www.indiana.edu/~mpsa/
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Rodriguez-Zepeda, Juan. "The Determinants of Strategic Voting in the 2002 and 2006 Presidential Elections in Brazil" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the MPSA Annual National Conference, Palmer House Hotel, Hilton, Chicago, IL, Apr 03, 2008 <Not Available>. 2009-05-23 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p267170_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Rodriguez-Zepeda, J. A. , 2008-04-03 "The Determinants of Strategic Voting in the 2002 and 2006 Presidential Elections in Brazil" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the MPSA Annual National Conference, Palmer House Hotel, Hilton, Chicago, IL Online <APPLICATION/PDF>. 2009-05-23 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p267170_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Abstract: Taking advantage of panel survey data, I pursue two goals in this paper. First I present an assessment of the amount of strategic voting found in the last two presidential elections in Brazil. Second, I develop an analysis of its causes. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
application/pdf |
| Page count: |
39 |
| Word count: |
8020 |
| Text sample: |
| The Determinants of Strategic Voting in the 2002 and 2006 Presidential Elections in Brazil Juan Antonio Rodriguez-Zepeda University of Pittsburgh Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association. Chicago IL. April 3 2008. I thank Barry Ames for his helpful comments. Introduction Utilizing the panel data collected by Barry Ames Andy Baker and Lucio Renno I address two questions regarding the voting behavior of Brazilians. First I ask whether voters faced the incentives and had |
| -1.513 0.471 0.001 N 899 Pseudo Rsq 0.146 Correctly Predicted 0.848 37 Figure 4. Predicted Probabilities of Strategic Voting by Perceived Closeness of Election Predicted Probability of Strategic Voting .4 .3 (by perceived closeness of election) Probability .2 .1 0 0 .2 .4 .6 .8 1 Normalized Thermometer (u2) Result Close Result Not Close 38 |
Similar Titles:
Voters’ Attention, Perceived Effects, and Voting Preferences: Negative Political Advertising in the 2006 Ohio Governor’s Election
Who Votes Strategically?_x000d_A Panel Data Analysis of the 2006 Mexican Presidential Election and an Individual-Level Model that Accounts for Measurement Error in the Dependent Variable
Refining and Redefining the Second-Order Election Model: Protest or Pure Preference Voting in Central and Eastern Europe
|
|
